My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/18/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
>
10/18/2011 SEWER COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:05:51 AM
Creation date
1/2/2019 2:06:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
SEWER COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/18/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br /> ;- V, <br /> Lombardo explained that the yellow area indicated theros ective areas for� � o Rs. Mr. <br /> Lombardo recommended that the information to be provided to Mr. Walter <br /> t USGS to con �der <br /> the nitrogen removal quantification that could -om uir the <br /> sterns in the modeling, <br /> which could provide additional information to the Commission that couldi <br /> ass st in reducing <br /> costs. l r. Gmee inquired about the removal o additional.nitro en after 0% was removed. <br /> err�oe . <br /> . Lombardo recommended superimposing the information on Mr.,Gregg's ro <br /> posed sewer , <br /> areas map, emphasizing that use of the PRB could meet the TMDL at a lover cost. Mr. Gregg's <br /> ria. could utilised to determines <br /> the most-practical practic .l locations to use the RBs. Ir. Walters <br /> could hien model it mass-wise to provide an economic comparison. Ch u <br /> ala stated that . . <br /> Mr. Walters would be developing model along with a visual of nitrogen concentrations, <br /> thereport of which will be ava- ilable in December. The Chair was unsure whether or not . . <br /> dd�tiol <br /> modeling could be requested sine it was a go emme tJ ro'ect. There was discussion r . <br /> l regard - <br /> the depth of the systems and the cost effectiveness of focusing on areas that were less h <br /> . g than 2 <br /> feet. The Chair inquired about use of well fences, um in and treating ground water p g g� ate,` and fir. <br /> Lombardo stated that he would not dismiss it but that it could be a cost issue. <br /> CORRESPONDENCE <br /> MELTING ADJOURNMENT <br /> A motion to adjourn the meeting was math by fir.Lyons. Mr.Malarkey seconded the <br /> motion. All voted unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:43 p.m& <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Jennifer IVB. Ch Pord <br /> Board Secretary <br /> LIST of DOCUMENTS <br /> -Jeff Gregg, DRAFT Scenarios Description <br /> -GID Monthly Progress Report <br /> -10/1 11 AQe Iomeica Emai I <br /> -Pio Lombardo-Town of Ma bpec Popponesset Bay and waquoit Bay Watersheds, Nitrex PRB <br /> Locations <br /> -Pio Lombardo-Town of Mashpee Popponesset Bay and Waquoit Bay watersheds l itrex PRB <br /> Locations with Depth<25 Feet <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.