My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/10/2011 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
>
8/10/2011 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2022 3:42:35 PM
Creation date
1/3/2019 1:19:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/10/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Laurent made a motion to put the June and July tonnage on the September meeting agenda. <br /> Mr. Tilton seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> Review/Approve FY-11 Closeout <br /> Mr. Jack indicated that the Closeout documents were self-explanatory and highlighted the FY-11 <br /> Budget Closeout identifying the remaining balance from the deducted expenditures, salaries and wages <br /> and electricity costs.The remaining balance of$68,510.68 was portioned out to each of the towns <br /> based on their use for the calendar year. Mr. Jack stated that a decision was needed to determine <br /> whether the remaining surplus would be disbursed by check or credited to the current fiscal year <br /> invoice. Over the past few years, members have had the amount credited to the fiscal year invoice. <br /> Ms. Laurent noted that a healthy capital balance remained and recommended that the amount be <br /> credited. Mr. Tilton inquired whether there would be additional capital expenses. Mr. Jack indicated <br /> that he would have additional information about the capital plan for the facility at the next meeting but <br /> that he did not expect it to be much. Mr. Jack recommended that a credit be taken. Ms. Laurent noted <br /> the possibility of the facility not being used beyond 2014. There was agreement to credit the funds to <br /> the current fiscal year invoice. <br /> Ms. Laurent made a motion to credit the FY-11 surplus towards the FY-12 operating costs. All <br /> voted unanimously. <br /> Review/Approve FY-12 User Charges <br /> Mr. Jack referenced the FY-12 User Charges that were based on the Fiscal Year Budgetapproved in <br /> February. The charges will be reduced due to the credit and invoices will be sent out this week. <br /> Ms. Laurent made a motion to accept the FY-12 User Charges as presented with the credit to be <br /> applied from the F-11 surplus. Mr. Tilton seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> Cape Cod Commission Solid Waste Advisory Committee(SWAG) Meeting Regarding REGI, <br /> Paul Tilton Update <br /> Mr. Tilton reported that Bourne and SEMASS continues to be considered and that E.L. Harvey, Waste <br /> Management and Mass Coastal offered presentations at the meeting. Mr. Tilton stated that E.L. <br /> Harvey and Waste Management would transport the waste, as well as offer end facilities to dispose of <br /> the trash. Mass Coastal indicated that they were continuing to work on a deal with SEMASS or <br /> possibly transfer the waste out of state if needed. Mr. Tilton suggested the importance ofadvising <br /> SWAC of the Board of Manager's direction for the future of solid waste disposal. Mr. Tilton <br /> suggested that it would be helpful to determine the importance of rail and the UCRTS and whether <br /> there was a desireto continue with the current arrangement or pursue other options. <br /> Regarding rail or trucking, Ms. Laurent stated that it should be determined based on the final disposal <br /> site, suggesting that the proposals include a breakdown of the costs. Ms. Laurent suggested that Mass <br /> Coastal could be eliminated because of their focus on SEMASS and limitedofferings. Ms. Laurent <br /> liked E.L. Harvey's and Waste Management's presentation that considered both trash and recyclables <br /> and recommended that the other organizations include consideration of recyclables. Mr, Barrett <br /> responded that E.L. Harvey did not have final disposal options and Waste Management offered end use <br /> in New Hampshire, which would be costly. Mr. Barrett noted that the Cape lacked consistency in the <br /> way that recyclables were addressed,posing a challenge for Bourne and SEMASS. Mr. Barrett noted <br /> that the focus has been on solid waste but that Bourne intended to present a recycling proposal at a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.