Laserfiche WebLink
30. If the application for Written Finding were to be approved by the Board of <br /> Appeals, it might render the Administrative Appeal of the cease and desist <br /> order moot. <br /> 31. The application for Written Finding was filed under a reservation of rights and <br /> without prejudice to the Administrative Appeal in the event that the <br /> application for Written Finding was not approved. <br /> 32. Public Hearings were held on both the Administrative Appeal and the <br /> application for Written Finding. <br /> 33. The Public Hearings were closed on November 28, 2018. <br /> 34. Thereafter, the Board voted to deny Honey's Administrative Appeal and to <br /> affirm the Building Commissioner's cease and desist order. <br /> 35. The Board issued a written decision confirming its vote and recorded same <br /> with the Town Clerk on December ?, 2018. A true and accurate copy of the <br /> written decisionis attached hereto as Exhibit 1. <br /> 36. The Board also voted to deny Honey's application for Written Finding. <br /> 37, The Board issued a written decision confirming its vote and recorded same <br /> with the Town Clerk on December 7, 2018. A true and accurate copy of the <br /> written decision is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. <br /> 7 <br />