My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/12/2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
>
12/12/2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2019 7:01:19 PM
Creation date
1/14/2019 2:45:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
ZBA Decision
Meeting Date
12/12/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A VARIANCE <br /> Gooseberry Island Trust& SN Trust <br /> Robert D. Emmeluth, Trustee of Gooseberry Island <br /> 0 Gooseberry Island (Map 100, Parcel 6-0-R), <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> V-2015-61 <br /> Attorney John Bowen, with Rackemann, Sawyer & Brewster represents the two <br /> private owners who own the last two houses on the left on the North side of Punkhom Point <br /> Rd. The owners of 80 Punkhom Point Road are James Atkins and John Weltman, and 84 <br /> Punkhom Point Road, owners, Robert and Michelle Wolpe. Mr. Wolpe was present in the <br /> audience. <br /> Attorney Bowen said these applications are the same as submitted back in 2013, <br /> and suggested that under Chapter 40A Section 16 that decision issued by the Board was <br /> not really final because the appeal is still pending in Superior Court. He disputes, and <br /> doesn't believe the applicant has any right to pave the road,or has any right to bring utilities <br /> down the road. Punkhorn Point is a private unpaved narrow road, and he disputes the <br /> applicant to travel on this road because it is a private road. <br /> Attorney Bowen said there are several 'items that are very much undecided, and to <br /> repeat the requests while there's a live action pending in Superior Court is wasteful and <br /> unnecessary. He asked the Board that the requests be denied on these grounds as presented, <br /> and it fails to meet the requirements of the Town's bylaws and also fails to meet Chapter <br /> 40A Section 10 for a variance. The Attorney said that his clients assert ownership to the <br /> Southern boundary and just below Punkhom Paint Rd, and below that, the Town has an <br /> active claim to that land. Those issues are open, and there will be a decision. The applicant <br /> claims ownership through a "release deed" for no consideration and for zero dollars. His <br /> final point is that the applicant's claim of financial hardship as current owner of an island <br /> with no money and with no proven way to access it, or any ownership on the part of <br /> Mashpee where he thinks he could put a bridge. <br /> Attorney Kate Connolly mentioned that Attorney Bowen was correct, it's simply a <br /> release deed that was taken for no payment, and also financial hardship is not one of the <br /> requirements to prove hardship under the bylaw, it has to be a hardship owing to unusual <br /> circumstances of shape, soil conditions, or topography, and none of those apply. <br /> Ashley Fisher, Shellfish Constable for the Town of Mashpee approached the Board <br /> and quoted a couple of points from the bylaw in Chapter 130 Section 57 (Shellfish <br /> Aquaculture Licenses) for the record. She said that the area is under a grant and because of <br /> this,there cannot be any disturbance of the licensed shellfish grant area. <br /> Mr. Gould asked Attorney Wall if he and his client addressed the Tribe's claims, <br /> and how would you repair any damage if there's an issue with pollution regarding their <br /> shellfish grant. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.