11/9/2017 BY-LAW REVIEW COMMITTEE Minutes

Home Browse Search

r r ZONING ITEMS TO CONSIDER 174-31 Land Use Requirement Table. Recommend the following change. Proposed: Dote 16. Remove `nor easement twenty 0 feet or more in width..." Reason: many lots have casements r'un'm'n through therm. Their reason for being is varied but unless it is a"road easement" f Wvould recon' mend that this language be removed or altered to state that the easement in question is in regards to a inroad easem of Why should someone loose land that can be counted towards their lot coverage because the easement is for gas, electric, etc. 174-25 Land Use Requirement Table. F. Principle automotive service and open- air--in drive-ire retail service. Recommend the following change. Proposed: Change P (2) from not allowed in the 1-1 District to a SP Reason: Under P (3) you can do automobile repair in the I-I District with a SP, so why can't you sell or rent cars within the 1-1 District with a P? 174-24 B. 1) Change this language Unless the proposal is the subject of a Special Permit application for which a public hearing,has been advertised, the applicant•shall also transmit, by registered or certified mail, a notice of said application to'any direct abutters as they appear on the most recent applicable to assessment list) and to the owners of any residence or non-residential structure any portion of which lies within three hundred (300) feet of that portion of the structure or site which is the subject of the plah review and shall provide receipts for said railings-to the Building Inspector. Proposed: delete the following line (any direct abutters as they appear on the most recent applicable tax assessment list) and to the owners of any residence or non-residential structure any portion of which lies within three hundred (300) feet- of that portion of the structure or site which is the subject of the plan review and.. replace with: any direct abutters as they appear on the.most recent applicable tax assessment list) and to the owners of any residence or non-residential structure any portion of which property directly touches the property in question Reason. The 300 foot requirement is addressed if the project is going to the Z . or Planning Board* If it is not going to either of those boards, What is the need to reach out that far when the-Plan Review Committee should only be interested in the impact that w6uld be directly affecting those abutters that do abut the prop erty?