Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> Board of Managers <br /> Upper Cape Regional Transfer Station <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> January 4, 2017 at 10 a.m. <br /> fashpee Town Hall <br /> Mashpee: Catherine Laurent, Chairman <br /> Falmouth: Ray Jack <br /> Sandwich: Paul Tilton <br /> Bourne: Dan Barrett, Phil Goddard (alt.) <br /> otic: Chris Segura <br /> Present: Chairman Catherine Laurent, Ray Jack, Paul Tilton, Chris Segura, Dan Barrett, Phil <br /> Goddard <br /> Also Present: Mike Richard & Mike cipione Weston& Sampson, Michael Mowbray <br /> Attorney Rob Kraus _Recycling Solutions; Shawn DeLud Nauset Disposal; Carl Cavossa <br /> Jay Zavala-- a.vossa Disposal Corp.;Neil IcLaughlin P ; John Pearson Saltine warrior <br /> Inc.; Joseph Stone&berry Mendes—MA State Police; Ed Gross Falmouth Representative to <br /> the Cape Cod Joint Transportation Committee <br /> CALL To ORDER <br /> The meeting was called to order by Chairman Laurent at 10:08 a.m. with a quorum. <br /> APPROVAL of MINUTES <br /> December 141, 2016 <br /> MOTION: Mr. Tilton made a notion to approve the minutes of December 14, 2016} Mr. <br /> Barrett seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> Finalization of RFP for Reuse of UCRTS and Finalization of Dates for Release <br /> Board members had been in receipt of an updated draft of the RFP by email from Weston <br /> Samson, which included comments discussed at the previous meeting. Copies were distributed <br /> to members of the audience. Mr. Richards discussed changes to the document as highlighted in <br /> the draft. <br /> Regarding Evaluation Criteria, Mr, Tilton referenced the 30B manual and inquired about the <br /> composite rating. Mr. Richard responded that each criteria would be ranked so that each <br /> proposal would have a composite rating using the categories of Non-Advantageous, <br /> Advantageous and Mighty Advantageous, but not a point system. Chairman Laurent inquired <br /> about criteria with greater weight and how it would be evaluated. Mr. Scipione responded that, <br /> in the composite rating, criteria could be ranked in order of importance when evaluating the <br /> proposals individually or placed in groups if Board members agreed with the sane categories, <br /> Ir. ,Tach recommended leaving it as is so that individuals could ranksince all criteria was <br /> equally as important, but make a note if something had greater value. The Chair suggested that <br /> the process be spelled out in the RFP to be transparent, allowing an individual to consider criteria <br /> of higher importance. Mr. Jack stated that the draft was written in compliance with 3013 laws <br /> X <br />