My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/1996 BOARD OF SELECTMEN Executive Session (4)
>
11/13/1996 BOARD OF SELECTMEN Executive Session (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2019 4:03:51 PM
Creation date
2/21/2019 4:00:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF SELECTMEN
Meeting Document Type
Executive Session
Meeting Date
11/13/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SANDWICII SCHOOL F <br /> A Report for the Sandwich .Public Schools <br /> Pa <br /> foundation bud eta es taraet v rates to staff positions to determine payroll and adds <br /> g PF C_ <br /> formula amounts for textbooks, athletics, maintenance, and insurance. <br /> Several features make the foundation budget unique to each district. Average salary levels <br /> are adjusted to reflect wage patterns in different regions of the state. Calculations are <br /> made separately for elementary, middle, high school,vocational, and bilingual students, <br /> with lower class sizes and higher book and equipment allowances for vocational, high <br /> school, and bilingual students. Extra funds are prox-ided for low income students. <br /> o se Pcrate count is taken for special education enrollment, but funding is provided based <br /> ' on estimates of the number of students likely to need such assistance. The foundation <br /> budget does not use the actual count of special education students,lest this tempt some <br /> districts needless) to classi students as special needs or penalize financial) districts <br /> v �' P P �' <br /> which succeed in meeting special needs within regular classroom settings. <br /> the foundation budget as built up from specific calculations on numbers of teach- <br /> Although . <br /> ers and administrators, average salary levels, and expected maintenance, it is not meant to <br /> end its money. Rather, it is <br /> be a detailed blueprint for exactly how each district should s <br /> �! p f P <br /> meant as a reasonable wav of arriving at an overall target spending level. Local schools and <br /> school districts are free to use these funds as they see best to meet the education im- <br /> provement goals included within the law. In four areas-professional development, text- <br /> books extended proarams, and ex-traordinary maintenance- superintendents are required <br /> to report the amounts spent and to explain any shortfalls from the foundation budget al-- <br /> lotments. These are areas traditionally shortfunded when school budgets are tight. <br /> The foundation budget is adjusted each year to reflect changes in enrollment and inflation. <br /> To provide certainty to the calculations, the foundation budget is based on actual past year <br /> ' enrollments. The foundation budget for the 1994-1990' school year, for example, is based <br /> g �' <br /> �s. <br /> on October 1993 enrollments. In calculating foundation budgets,the Department of Edu- <br /> cation DoE looks at all students who reside within a particular community, regardless of <br /> where they actually go to school. Students who go to out of town schools under the choice <br /> `i and special <br /> education students tuitioned out to private schools, are counted to- <br /> program,� P <br /> ward their home town s foundation budget. <br /> E <br /> r; <br /> Meeting the Foundation Budget <br /> l) brie <br /> Districts which do not spend at foundation budget amounts must eventually� P g �' g send P <br /> tk ing to foundation levels. This is to be done over the seven years of the school reform la-,vv. <br /> Responsibility for increasing spending is split between local and state governments. The <br /> t law establishes a target local tax amount for each city and town, based on its per-capita in- <br /> ,. tY P P <br /> come and its per--pupil equalized property valuation (the gross standard of effort). In gradually gen- <br /> eral, local communities are expected raduall to increase taxes to this standard if this is <br /> Y <br /> z. necessary to achieve foundation level budgets. The difference between current tax levels <br /> ``` Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.