My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/14/2012 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
>
3/14/2012 UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2019 5:03:30 PM
Creation date
4/24/2019 2:10:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
UPPER CAPE REGIONAL TRANSFER STATION BOARD OF MANAGERS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
F i <br /> Mr. Goddard inquired whether the UCRTS building could sit idle for a,while, should waste <br /> instead be trucked out of the area. Mr. Cavossa referenced the remaining two year agreement <br /> with SEMAS S and suggested that it presented an opportunity for the Board of Managers to try <br /> something new, such as a public/private partnership. Mr. Cavossa discussed pricing changes as a <br /> result of competition and the benefits of using the rail to open up other opportunities such as <br /> C&D or other towns joining the IMA. Mr. Goddard agreed that the creation of energy by way of <br /> the rail would be far more cost effective. Mr. Cavossa inquired whether the Board would be <br /> willing to accept proposals for a public/private partnership for the next two years. The Chair <br /> responded that the Board would consider new ideas, but that they were leaning toward an RFP <br /> process. Chairman Elliott also referenced a new opportunity and the possibility of a long truck <br /> haul to Southbridge, noting that the Board should consider each and every opportunity. <br /> Chairman Elliott confirmed that the UCRTS was still committed to 40,000 tons per year for the <br /> next Z 1/2 years, with Ms. Laurent agreeing unless usage was expanded. It was confirmed that <br /> SEMAS S planned to reconsider their lower rate at the end of the month. <br /> Mr. Cavossa stated that the operational costs of$7 per ton were high at the UCRTS and noted his <br /> intent to seek a recycling permit and need to hire three workers. Mr. Cavossa suggested that he <br /> could combine his labor at the UCRTS to supply MSW and meet the minimum tonnages, and <br /> negotiate with SEMIAS S for a lower rate by providing increased tonnage. The Chair'stated that <br /> Mr. Cavossa had already agreed to bring the tonnage but had not been doing it. There was <br /> discussion about the tonnage that Cavossa was able top roduce in July 2011 compared to other <br /> months, and the increased tonnage that occurred since the rates were reduced. Mr. Sullivan <br /> stated that it was a result of competition and Mr. Cavossa stated that the permit was illegal and <br /> that flow control could not be enforced for 20 years. The Chair stated that flow control was now <br /> legal. <br /> Ms. Laurent stated that the Board of Managers would need to have the conversations about <br /> whether the UCRTS would be opened up to MSW from anywhere, particularly as it could impact <br /> the Town of Falmouth who had previously expressed concern about local impacts. Mr. Goddard <br /> stated that the permit allowed 286 tons per day and it was noted that an average of 150 tons per <br /> day was being processed. Mr. Goddard inquired about C&D and Mr. Podgurski responded that it <br /> would be added to the existing train. <br /> Mr. Cavossa indicated that taking over the loading of municipal solid waste would lower the <br /> costs in exchange for Cavossa to be able to load their own waste at no cost. Mr. Cavossa <br /> recommended that a cap not be placed on the waste but Mr. Goddard stated that it was a <br /> permitted cap. Mr. Cavossa emphasized the value of making the UCRTS viable by not limiting <br /> amounts. Mr. Goddard noted that it was intricately linked to what the towns wished to do with <br /> their trash. Mr. Cavossa suggested that it would be challenging to build an RSP since everyone <br /> would have different ideas and recommended a Request for Ideas instead. Mr. Goddard <br /> recommended that the discussion remain on the agenda. Chairman Elliott stated that he was <br /> open to all ideas that would improve the operation, but emphasized his desire to reduce costs to <br /> the towns over the-next 2 1I2 contracted years. <br /> MIs. Laurent recommended that each town consider C&D, especially since Mashpee and <br /> Sandwich did not accept it locally and sent it to'Bourne. Mr. Goddard will discuss C&D further <br /> with MIr. D. Barrett. MIs. Laurent indicated that she would follow up with SEMAS S regarding <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.