My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/20/2019 BOARD OF SELECTMEN Agenda Packet
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
SELECT BOARD
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
05/20/2019 BOARD OF SELECTMEN Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2019 5:07:54 PM
Creation date
5/30/2019 1:22:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
BOARD OF SELECTMEN
Meeting Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
05/20/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•• p►v►E[x Rt,� <br /> •� <br /> 41 <br /> FJ <br /> re <br /> van I eh r <br /> ;• <br /> !:.:A 4 ...........PZ <br /> *.......... + " <br /> .......... .. <br /> .. <br /> Town Plann er <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> To: Carol Sherman,Chair,Affordable Housing Trust <br /> From: Evan R. Lehrer, Town Planner <br /> Date: May 16, 2019 <br /> Re: 950 Falmouth Road Warping Group Findings <br /> Attachment A of the RFP outlined the comparative evaluation criteria to be utilized in the review <br /> of any received proposals. In c000rdination with Mr.Allan Isbitz,Chair of the Affordable Housing <br /> Committee,I generated scoresheets reflective of the comparative evaluation criteria. <br /> Having found that both proposals submitted met the minimum threshold criteria,these score- <br /> sheets were utilized to weigh how well and to what degree proposals achieved the Towns vision <br /> for the site and how well they responded to the comparative evaluation criteria. <br /> Ultimately,our findings showed that the proposal submitted by POAH/HAC showed-considerable <br /> experience with the capacity to successfully carry out the development proposed. Further they ad- <br /> equately demonstrated their ability to secure financing, and maintain the asset over the long-term. <br /> Commonwealth Community Developers,LLC failed to demonstrate in their proposal the expe- <br /> rience and capacity that the Town was seeking in a developer of this site. Due to the lack of coni- <br /> arable reference 12rojects and lack of a demonstrated ability to secure fznancin far 12rojectof a <br /> similar sco e the Working GroW was unable to feel confident in Commonwealth Communit <br /> Develoer LLCs abilit to deliver on their ro osed concept on budget and on time. <br /> The attached scoring matrix,reference checks,summary of findings, and spreadsheet outlining <br /> the primary components of each proposal show the strength and weaknesses of each application. <br /> Based on my conversations with PDAH's references,Mashpee would be lucky to collaborate with <br /> such a venerated developer on this project if the Trust opts to award the project to them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.