Laserfiche WebLink
7/29/201.9 <br /> Cmt-Effectiven-ess <br /> • A key tactor in evaluating a regional facility is determining whether the regional <br /> facility is cost-effective when compared to the other options a community may <br /> have. <br /> • To facilitate this assessment, a conceptual cost allocation model was developed <br /> for the JBCC SLAMS Candidate Plan. A broad assessment of cost-effectiveness <br /> was conducted for the Upper cape towns. At the scale identified in the 2019 <br /> Report, the conclusions are: <br /> The JBCC SWMS approach appears to be more cost-effective than individual town facilities <br /> The JBCC SWMS approach provides sufficient advantages to warrant continued planning. <br /> Each participant will need to conduct its own detailed assessment of cost­ <br /> effectiveness and then determine its desired level of participation. <br /> It is important to note that if one participant changes its participation level(i.e.,whether an <br /> increase or decrease),that change impacts the cost-effectiveness for all of the participants <br /> (i.e.,better or worse). It may take several iterations in order to arrive at the final participation <br /> levels. <br /> WRIG"T PIERCE <br /> F.sr4rrrring a 11rlZer Igsiac�miwd '�'� <br /> t <br /> [mplementation Timeline and Action,items <br /> If a regional JBCC wastewater system is to come to fruition,it will require a <br /> concerted and multitrack effort from Federal, State and local government <br /> officials focused on the implementation action items. <br /> Planning, permitting,design and construction of the JBCC SLAMS could take 8 to 10 years. <br /> The recommended action items are to: <br /> * Confirm effluent disposal capacity <br /> * Confirm cost-effectiveness and commitment level on a town-by-town basis <br /> * Confirm desired implementation timeline as a group <br /> a Secure additional funding for planning activities <br /> Facilitate a transition from the"existing condition"to the"JBCC SWMS" <br /> If the towns desire to continue collaborative planning efforts for this opportunity, <br /> an inter-municipal agreement would be beneficial and should be considered. <br /> WRIGM-PIERCE- <br /> tn inring a 8rtttr[griranrrrret 12 <br /> 6 <br />