Laserfiche WebLink
7/29/2019 <br /> key factor in evaluating a regional facility is determining whether the regional <br /> facility is cost-effective when compared to the other options a community may <br /> have. <br /> To facilitate this assessment, a conceptual cost allocation model was developed <br /> for the JBCC SWMS Candidate Plan. A broad assessment of cost-effectiveness <br /> was conducted for the Upper Cape towns. i <br /> t the scale identified in the 2019 <br /> Report, the conclusions are: <br /> µ The JBCC SWMS approach appears to be more cost-effective than individual town facilities <br /> The J CC SWMS approach provides sufficient advantages to warrant continued planning. <br /> Each participant will need to conduct its oven detailed assessment of cost-- <br /> effectiveness and then determine its desired level of participation. <br /> It is important to note that if one participant changes its participation level i.e.,whether an <br /> increase or decrease),that change impacts the cost-effectiveness for all of the participants <br /> i.e. better or worse). It may tale several iterations in order to arrive at the final participation <br /> levels. <br /> . KaZaa &n,a par Cir <br /> Im em )n imeiing-,and A <br /> pl_ fig-T! <br /> _entafi <br /> If a reglonal JBCC wastewater ater syste is to comae to fruition, it will require a <br /> concerted and multi-track effort from Federal, State and local government <br /> officials focused on the implementation action items. <br /> o Planning, permitting,design and construction of the J'I C C SWMS could tale 8 to 10 years. <br /> The recommended action items are to: <br /> Confirm effluent disposal capacitor <br /> o Confirm cost-effectiveness and commitment level on a town-by-town basis <br /> o Confirm desired implementation timeline as a group <br /> ,enure additional funding for planning activities <br /> o Facilitate a transition from the"existing condition"to the "JBCC SWMS' <br /> If the towns desire to continue collaborative planning efforts for this opportunity, <br /> an inter-municipal agreement would be beneficial ial and should be considered. <br /> RranT-PIERCE <br /> ,iw%rriin aaaanal 12 <br /> 6 <br />