Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br /> Board of Selectmen <br /> Minutes <br /> November 18, 2019 <br /> APPOINTMENTS & HEARINGS <br /> Presentations on Staffing Wastewater Treatment Facilities by Town Staff or Contract Operators; Case <br /> Studies of Falmouth and Chatham. Presenters: <br /> Ray Jack, Falmouth DPW Director: (continued) <br /> The $1.5 million budget supports $630,000 in salary and overtime wages for 8 operators. The plant <br /> services 2,300 accounts at a cost of$268 per year, treating 8 in. gpy of septage. There are 11 lift stations <br /> and 37 miles of mains (13 miles of force mains)within this system. A secondary smaller plant is situated <br /> in the New Silver Beach area in the vicinity of the North Falmouth School, and treats 13k gpd. <br /> Mr. Jack indicated there is no debt service on the wastewater system. It is 100%rate covered, including <br /> maintenance. Utilizing an Enterprise Fund, water and sewer expenses are shared. Operational costs do not <br /> cycle on the levy. <br /> The Town of Falmouth manages all operations of the facility. There are no contract operations. Capital <br /> expenses have a debt return on principal and interest. Betterments are an option. The allocation is <br /> generally 70%homeowner and 30%town. When considering betterments and SEU's Mr. Jack <br /> recommended defining what is included and what is not included, and to determine what system is fair and <br /> not necessarily challenged. Falmouth processes septage at a lower than market rate maintaining this <br /> service for the Town of Falmouth only. <br /> When considering overall funding, the town would need to make the decision to fund by the sewer rate to <br /> incur the debt service of the tax rate. It was noted the Long Pond facility was funded '/2 from the tax rate <br /> and '/z from the facility. The original construction cost was $40 in. There were 12 change orders, some of <br /> which were credited increasing the budget just under$200,000. Mr. Jack indicated that change orders <br /> become necessary with less preparation. It was recommended the town spend a significant amount of <br /> review on the design provision and allocate a contingency of 1.5%to the overall cost. <br /> It is important to have the participating community buy-into the project for support. In the Town of <br /> Falmouth a committee having technical skills with respect to design review was established, and costs were <br /> presented to the voters. It was recommended that a strong project team initiate discussions with DEP and <br /> make the extra effort on supervisory control to maintain budget projections. <br /> Dr. Robert Duncanson Chatham Director of Health and Natural Resources: <br /> In the Town of Chatham a committee was developed of citizens,the business community and others <br /> representing all of the geographic areas of town to review all scenarios and to educate the public. With an <br /> existing wastewater collection system and sewer treatment plant, the project plan was facilities driven. In <br /> considering scenarios and the environment as a primary factor, it was determined the town would sewer <br /> phase I and phase II, the immediate area in the downtown core of Chatham. It is the intention of Chatham <br /> to sewer 100% of the town. There is 20 years remaining in the overall plan. <br /> Dr. Robert Duncanson, Chatham Director of Health&Natural Resources indicated the oxidation ditch or <br /> carrousel process is used in the $150 in. plant collection system which is comprised of 14 pumping <br /> stations. With water mains, gas mains and utilities, the project is disruptive. <br />