Laserfiche WebLink
Table 8-4 Comparison of in-lake management options for Santuit Pond. <br /> Feature Dredging Artificial Circulation Nutrient <br /> Inactivation <br /> Submerged Solar <br /> Surface <br /> Unit <br /> Capital Cost/�quip site S44000' �7�O �O�' <br /> ` ' ' � ��-l� mUhOn ' ' ' <br /> meta|lation) 88,UOO S300,000 200.000 <br /> Operation& K1GiDte8 $1O6OOO- <br /> 8OC�/15y�O[� O ` $15080 $O <br /> 332,O0O ` <br /> Total C0st,'15years S 12-1 $210 <br /> 0mi||iOo `000' $215^UO8' S180'000- <br /> 428.000 S313.000 200.000 <br /> S1OOUOO- ��O0OO- �2U00O' ��O0UD- <br /> P8[Oli�in�C0�� ' ' ` ` <br /> 200.000 50,000 50.0U0 50,000 <br /> Area Vf Pond Treated 71% 100% 1O8Y6 71% <br /> Varies depending <br /> And[jD8��d |D��rn�| TPLO8d 0� und�dy�D�' 6796 67% 75% <br /> Reduction sediment <br /> ChemiSty <br /> Predicted In-lake TPconcentration ' 38Vg/L 38ug/L 33uo/L <br /> F'0S5ib|e <br /> short-term <br /> Potential Toxicity None None None aluminum <br /> toxicity if pH <br /> is <6Vr>0 <br />