My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
11/13/2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2023 10:52:39 AM
Creation date
5/1/2020 10:38:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/13/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> NOVEMBER 13,2019 <br /> Attorney Kevin Kirrane represented the homeowners for the Special Permit and Variance <br /> requests for purposes of razing and replacing a single-family residential structure on this <br /> particular lot. Also present was Tom Bunker with BSS Design, and Arianna, with Archi- <br /> Tech Associates. <br /> The Special Permit request is required under Section 174-17.1;and the Variance is required <br /> for the setback from the wetland resource areas. The plan shows the unusual shape of the <br /> lot with the existing dwelling and is situated up against the coastal bank.Most coastal banks <br /> run along the coast, but in this particular case the coastal bank runs along the coast and <br /> inland. There's a large concrete seawall that runs along the beach and completely around <br /> the existing dwelling, and the existing out building that exists on the site. Attorney Kirrane <br /> pointed out that the 50 ft. setback criteria runs through the house, and also shows both the <br /> FEMA coastal bank, and the Mashpee coastal bank completely surrounding the proposed <br /> dwelling. The Variance relief request includes the seawall and the accessory garage. <br /> The proposed dwelling is located in the Popponesset Overlay District which allows for lot <br /> coverage at 25%,minimum lot size of 6,000 sq. ft.,and 60 ft. of frontage. The total lot area <br /> is 21,067 sq. ft., and 20,100 sq. ft. of upland area. The proposed dwelling is still similarly <br /> situated as the other dwelling with the 50 ft. setback line going through the dwelling. There <br /> are a few other non-conformities related to the existing dwelling. The closest point was <br /> 23.1 ft. from Jeep Place, the proposed dwelling will be 24.4 ft. from Jeep Place, and is <br /> moved further back. The 23.1 ft. is a non-conforming condition because the current zoning <br /> is 25 ft. from the road. In addition, there is the existing out building that sits less than 15 <br /> ft. from the side line. This building is being eliminated in the proposed redevelopment of <br /> the site, so that non-conformity relative to the side yard is being eliminated as well. The <br /> other non-conforming condition as it relates to the dwelling is the distance from the <br /> dwelling to the coastal bank. Currently the dwelling sits at its closest point to the coastal <br /> bank that runs along the beach at 19.3 ft.The dimensions also depict 28 ft. and 26 ft.further <br /> along the beach. The proposed dwelling will sit 32.3 and 29 ft.from that coastal bank along <br /> the beach. This is improving the distance of the dwelling to the coastal bank on the <br /> Nantucket Sound side.Unfortunately in moving the building further away from the coastal <br /> bank, on the Nantucket Sound side, and an increase in the side of the building it is going <br /> closer to the coastal bank that's on the landward side of the particular lot. It is <br /> approximately 15-17 ft. closer on the inland side adjacent to lot 7A, but improving the <br /> condition as it appears along the beach facing Nantucket Sound. <br /> The proposed lot coverage shown on the plan is 17.8% which is well below the 25%that <br /> is allowed in the Popponesset Overlay District. The Board must find that what is proposed <br /> is not substantially more detrimental than what exists. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.