Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JANUARY 8,2020 <br /> 4. New Addition/Remodeling for: Ferner Residence, 44Barbary Circle, Scale: 1/4 = <br /> 1'-0", Date: 7/22/2019,Drawing No.: Al-First Floor Plan,A2—Second Floor Plan. <br /> 5. The Board issues a Variance in the amount of. 12 ft. for the front yard setback. <br /> 6. Conditioned on all Town Department comments read into the record including but <br /> not limited to Board of Health comments. <br /> NEW HEARINGS <br /> 24 Melissa Avenue: Petitioner,Barbara B.Nichols requests a Special Permit under §174- <br /> 17.1 of the Zoning Bylaws to raze and replace one of three residential structures situated <br /> on property located in an R-5 Zoning District, Map 21 Parcel 1, Mashpee, MA. (Owner of <br /> Record: Barbara B.Nichols and Robert C..Nichols, Trustees). <br /> 24 Melissa Avenue: Petitioner, Barbara B. Nichols requests a Written Finding under <br /> §174-17 of the Zoning Bylaws to raze and replace one of three residential structures <br /> situated on property located in an R-5 Zoning District, Map 21 Parcel 1, Mashpee, MA. <br /> (Owner of Record: Barbara B. Nichols and Robert C.Nichols, Trustees). <br /> Attorney Kevin Kirrane represented the Nichols' family for their raze and replace project. <br /> The property is situated within Melissa Avenue which is a public way on either side of the <br /> Nichols parcel and was an easement taken by the Town. The lot is five (5) acres and has <br /> three residential structures;the applicants seek to raze and replace the farmhouse structure. <br /> The structure dates back to the 1800 (circa.1740). This structure was re-built in the 1940's. <br /> The proposed structure will essentially be in the same foot print of the existing structure. <br /> The new structure conforms to all the required setback criteria requirements. It's over 100 <br /> ft.from the wetlands and 80 plus feet from the side yards.The reason for the Special Permit <br /> request under §174-17.1, and §174-17 is largely because there are three residential <br /> structures on a single lot; an argument could be made that the use is non-conforming. <br /> Typically, only one family residential building is allowed on a single lot. However,this lot <br /> is a five(5)acre lot which makes it different than most scenarios. The existing lot coverage <br /> is 2.19%, and the proposed lot coverage will be 2.17%because the shed will be removed. <br /> The proposed structure is not substantially more detrimental than what exists, and will not <br /> create a situation that is substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood. <br /> Attorney Kirrane received the Board of Health comments just prior to the meeting,and was <br /> unable to respond. He asked the Board if they are inclined to grant the relief,that it can be <br /> conditioned upon receiving the appropriate approvals from the Board of Health. The <br /> accessor's records indicate that the cottage is a two bedroom structure, and the farmhouse <br /> has four bedrooms for a total of six. The information from the Board of Health is that it is <br /> not designed for six. His client is willing to upgrade the septic system to accommodate the <br /> use. The proposed project received an Order of Conditions from the Conservation <br /> Commission. <br /> 5 <br />