Laserfiche WebLink
2. Sign expense warrants. It was understood that expense warrants would have to be signed <br /> outside of the meeting,due to there being no Board members physically present at the meeting. <br /> 1. Review of request for new Retail Food Establishment Permit—The Poppy Market, 259 Shore <br /> Drive. Mr. Harrington commented that the applications and fees have been submitted for this <br /> establishment. No ServSafe or Allergen Awareness are required, as the request is for retail only <br /> and no preparation of food will be performed. An inspection must be performed priorto issuance <br /> of the permit. Mr. Harrington recommended approval of the Tobacco Sales Permit application <br /> for this establishment based on there being a previously issued Tobacco Sales Permit for this <br /> location with the prior ownership. <br /> The applicant, Mike Morrison, dialed in remotely and stated that he was the owner of Rideaway <br /> Adventures,also in Popponesset Marketplace,and they were excited to get started with this new <br /> retail market venture. <br /> There being no further comments or discussion, Veronica Warden moved to approve the 2020 <br /> Retail Food Establishment Permit and the 2020 Tobacco Sales Permit for The Poppy Market at 259 <br /> Shore Drive. Motion seconded by Brian Baumgaertel. Roll call vote: Brian Baumgaertel (yes); <br /> Veronica Warden (yes). VOTE: Unanimous (2-0). <br /> 2. Review of request for new Tobacco Sales Permit —The Poppy Market, 259 Shore Drive. This <br /> matter was addressed by the Board in the previous motion. <br /> 3. Review of request for Title.5 variances—Cape Cod Coffee, 10 Evergreen Circle. Mr. Harrington <br /> commented that a variance has been requested to allow the reserve area at 10 Evergreen Circle <br /> not to be constructed in accordance with the Commercial Septic System Regulation. The owner <br /> of the property provided a letter to the Board explaining the conditions of the variance. In other <br /> cases, the Board has allowed a variance to existing facilities but only when a denitrification is <br /> retroactively installed. This is new construction and the soil absorption system(SAS)will be under <br /> pavement. Mr. Harrington stated that, in the past,it has been found that having the reserve area <br /> constructed with the ability to use it when the primary fails is a huge advantage for the property <br /> owner. <br /> Mr. Harrington commented that, if construction of the reserve area is required at the time of <br /> installation,an alternative variance is being requested to allow the reserve area to be constructed <br /> more than three feet below grade. Soil conditions within the proposed reserve area were <br /> different from the test holes that were performed for the septic design. Proposed trenches will <br /> be rated H-20 and vented,and the SAS will be under the proposed parking or driveway area. <br /> Ms. Warden reiterated how beneficial it is to install the reserve area at the time of installation <br /> and,conversely,how costly and disruptive it has typically been,down the road,when the reserve <br /> area is not existing and the primary system has failed. Ms.Warden stated that,at the time of the <br /> original perc test,the brush was so thick to the rear of the property, it was agreed that the test <br /> would be done in the front. She further stated that normally, under those circumstances, she <br /> would witness the soils at the time of installation,at least to determine if there might be silt loam. <br /> Ms.Warden asked if there was a note on the plan that"Agent was to witness soils at the time of <br /> installation", and Mr. Harrington stated that he would look into that. <br /> Rich Tabaczynski, from Atlantic Design Engineers, introduced himself for the record and stated <br /> that there was a note on the plan stating that the soils were to be confirmed at the time of <br /> 3 <br />