Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> MAY 13,2020 <br /> Jonathan noticed that the chicken coop is two ft. from the lot line and should be 40 ft. He <br /> asked Charlie what can be done to correct this. Charlie said that if a complaint is filed,he <br /> could issue a cease and desist order. He said he would require evidence that the coop was <br /> not there prior to the original zoning bylaw. Jonathan said that the Board just told the prior <br /> applicant that he has to be 15 ft. from his lot line, and it would not be fair. Mr. Blaisdell <br /> said if that was re-built, or even renovated is it considered a pre-existing non-conforming <br /> situation. Charlie said he needs some proof when it was originally built. <br /> Kevin said that a portion of that chicken coop was actually on his client's property, and it <br /> was since removed from the property because his client put in a fence. <br /> There were no comments submitted from Charlie Rowley,but he was given the revised site <br /> plan. Mr. Bonvie said he can condition upon his approval and overseeing the project. <br /> Mr. Senie said if there is another officer or consultant to review engineering concerns,such <br /> as sound transmission, that the Board might base their decision on, it could be considered <br /> an illegal delegation of the Board's authority. Jonathan said that the Board specifically <br /> looks at drainage.Mr. Bonvie said that it is common that the Board obtain comments from <br /> Charlie Rowley, Consultant, and has asked for his opinion for the past 15 years. <br /> Mr. Kirrane said that the permit decision of the Board is not subject to Charlie Rowley's <br /> approval. Charlie Rowley is put in a supervisory position to make sure that as the <br /> construction moves forward it is consistent with what was approved. <br /> Sharon read the abutter' list and letter submitted from the Highlands Homeowner's <br /> Association into the record. <br /> Chairman Furbush announced that he only wants to discuss the four open items, not <br /> anything has already been mentioned. <br /> Mr. Kirrane said most of those abutters do not qualify as abutters under the statute. Also, <br /> he doesn't believe that any of these abutters saw the plans. He said one abutter mentioned <br /> an auto body shop that was from a previous application, and another abutter mentioned a <br /> building within 10 ft. from the property line, and this building is 90 ft. from the property <br /> line. Mr. Blaisdell agreed with Kevin. <br /> John Fish said is he is concerned about the noise. <br /> Bill Grossman who resides at 69 Dover said that he is concerned about the boat storage, <br /> and wanted to know if a motion was made. Jonathan said that it was a discussion, not a <br /> motion.The Board has io vote.Mr. Grossman asked about the hours of operation. <br /> 6 <br /> i <br />