Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JULY 8,2020 <br /> Cindy gave a history of the property saying it was owned and built by her grandparents <br /> back in the 1970's. The original site plan contemplated a 15 ft. setback from the property <br /> line, but the house was set in the wrong location. The Association did a survey and it was <br /> shown that the deck was built over the property line. After purchasing the home from her <br /> family, she had to enter into an easement agreement with the Association to obtain title <br /> insurance.This agreement was included with her petition package.The Association was in <br /> agreement with her proposal as long as she eliminated the overhang of the deck from the <br /> property. The existing deck is not built to code and is not safe.In addition,there's a breeze <br /> way that has a 2 ft. drop off the back of the original staircase without a railing. She has <br /> secured a builder to reconstruct the deck to conform to current day building codes. All the <br /> setbacks on the other side of the property are being met,and the lot coverage will be moved <br /> from 18.6%to 19.3% and still is under the 20%requirement. <br /> Chairman Furbush said that he was pleased with the presentation, and all his questions <br /> were answered. <br /> Scott asked what the side setback was from the house itself. The house is 1.5 ft. from the <br /> side, and she is seeking a 14 ft. variance. <br /> Mr. Gould had no questions. Jim Reiffarth had no comments. Bill had no comments. <br /> Charlie had no comments. <br /> Sharon read the Board of Health comments into the record; no comments. Sharon read the <br /> Conservation comments into the record, and the project was approved by the Conservation <br /> Department. <br /> Scott mentioned to the contractor to be careful that the diamond pier legs don't go beyond <br /> the property line below grade. The contractor said he will be using 4 x 6 framing to hold <br /> the deck up, and using a 4 x 4 railing system. <br /> No abutters called in. <br /> Bill mentioned that there will be two separate motions. <br /> Scott made a motion to approve the Written Finding deck project for 53 James Circle with <br /> the following conditions; <br /> 1. The Board has determined that the applicant meets all the conditions of a Written <br /> Finding under Mass General Law 40A Section 6. <br /> 2. Site Plan: Provided by: Coastal Engineering, Co. Project: Terri Lee Jessen, James <br /> K. True &Timothy V. True, 53 James Circle,Mashpee,MA. Sheet Title: Plan <br /> Showing Proposed Deck. Scale: 1"= 10',Drawing File: C19317-V,Drawn by <br /> JLH, Checked by: JDM, Sheet I of 1: C2.1.1,Project No.: C19317.00. Date: June <br /> 11, 2020, Signed by: John McElwee No.: 33602. <br /> 2 <br />