Laserfiche WebLink
Lombardo responded that his goal was to demonstrate compliance and Mr. Fudala expressed optimism <br /> that the thresholds could be met in Scenario 3. It was noted that the sewering scenario included the <br /> Falmouth portion of the watershed. Mr. Lombardo added that Falmouth had been included and there <br /> was not much movement of water around the watersheds. Mr. Eichner also noted that treated effluent <br /> from some clusters, including Cluster 4 and Cluster 5, has been taken out of the watershed with the <br /> revised scenario. Mr. Rubenstein responded that discharge sites were re-located. Mr. Lombardo added <br /> that the revised scenario does not rely on any I/A systems. <br /> Workshop Session on Development of Next Round of Scenarios: <br /> Mr. Fudala referenced the maps on display indicating properties in Town that were already sewered <br /> with private systems,represented by a mustard yellow color, such as New Seabury,Mashpee <br /> Commons, Southport,the High School,Willowbend and Stratford Ponds. Mr. Fudala stated that all <br /> systems would require upgrades in order to reduce the numbers. A typical plant is expected to run in <br /> the range of 2 1/z-10 but Mr. Fudala estimated that the existing plants are running in a range of 5-7, <br /> which should be reduced to approximately 3 or less. Mr. Fudala expressed his preference to utilize the <br /> existing facilities and discharge areas. In reference to the map, discharge areas for existing plants are <br /> represented by dark blue, and Mr. Fudala described the locations for each site. The other shade of blue <br /> represents discharge sites for which estimates were provided by Nate Weeks and particle track <br /> modeling for where the water will flow were provided by USGS. Mr. Fudala shared maps of the <br /> particle track modeling with the consultants and referenced the following: <br /> Mashpee Transfer Station site flows to the Mashpee River <br /> Keeter Property site flows to Popponesset Bay <br /> Asher's Path site flows to the Quashnet River and Mashpee River <br /> New Seabury flows to the ocean <br /> At existing facilities: <br /> Old Stratford Pond site flows to the Santuit River <br /> Willowbend site flows to the Santuit River <br /> South Cape Village flows to the Mashpee River <br /> Mashpee Commons flows the Mashpee River <br /> Southport flows to the Quashnet River <br /> High School flows to the Quashnet River j <br /> At future conditions: <br /> Town Hall flows to the Mashpee River <br /> Under Heritage Park ball field flows to the Mashpee River <br /> Under the High School ball field flows across the Quashnet River <br /> Mr. Fudala questioned the best location for eliminating the water and the sub-watershed that could <br /> handle a significant amount of discharge,knowing that the main priority was to protect the Mashpee <br /> River. Mr. Howes responded that the watersheds are very saturated and that New Seabury presents the <br /> best option. Mr. Howes further stated that anything being returned to the Mashpee River would need <br /> to be overbalanced to remove a significant amount of nitrogen. Mr. Howes suggested that discharging <br /> fiarther south and closer to the inlet would provide a better balancing act. Mr. Howes and Mr. Fudala <br /> discussed the Route 28 and Mashpee/Wakeby Pond area. <br /> When discussing areas that should not be utilized for discharge,Mr. Eichner recommended that <br /> scenario results be considered,noting that Mashpee River and Quashnet River represent the greatest <br /> 2 <br />