My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-Annual Town Report
>
2011-Annual Town Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2021 4:09:52 PM
Creation date
2/19/2021 4:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Annual_Town_Report
DocType
Annual Town Report
Year
2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Habitat for Humanity of f Cage Cod,Inc v Zoning MEZ Realty Inc v Board of up���►, <br /> Board of Appeals " <br /> gp Suffolk Superior Court C.A.No.10-935 <br /> Housing Appeals Committee,Docket No.2011-01 <br /> This is an appeal pursuant to G.L.c.30A, <br /> This matter is an appeal pursuant to G.L. c. 40B an administrative decision by the Board of Health to <br /> of the ZBA's denial of a comprehensive permit for adopt Manufactured Home Community Regulations, <br /> construction of a single family affordable residence at The parties filed Motions for Judgment on the <br /> 24 Russell Road. Upon conferencing the subject Pleadings and oral argument was held on those <br /> appeal with the Chairman of the Housing Appeals Motions on January 17, 2011. The Court issued its <br /> Committee (HAC) and a HAC mediator, the parties decision on July 5, 2011,upholding the validity of the <br /> reached a settlement whereby the subject comprehen- Regulations, denying MEZ's claim that it was singled <br /> € <br /> sive permit was issued pursuant to an order of the out and denied equal protection of the laws by the <br /> HAC dated October 28, 2011. Board's enforcement actions, but, upholding a proce. <br /> Krock v.Zonin Board of A dural challenge to the Board's orders determining that <br /> g ppeals <br /> Land Court Case No.395229 MEZ violated the Regulations and the Sanitary Code <br /> due to the lack of specific findings of fact in the <br /> This case involves a property owner's appeal Board's Orders. The Court set aside the violations and <br /> pursuant to G.L. c. 40A, §17 from the Board's denial remanded the matter back to the Board for establish- <br /> of a Special Permit and a Variance with regard to ment of written findings of fact in support of its deter- <br /> property located at 4 Cross Street.All discovery in this mination that MEZ violated the BOH Regulations and <br /> matter has been completed and the parties are cur- <br /> the Sanitary Code compliant with § 11(8). <br /> rently awaiting a Pretrial Conference date from the <br /> Court. Regan v. Zoning Board of Appeals <br /> Inspector of Buildings and Molai <br /> Mashg�e v South ape Res rt nd arLand Court Case No. 11 Misc.446055 <br /> Club Association <br /> Land Court Case No.MISC 381213 This is an appeal by an abutter pursuant to G,L. <br /> c. 40A, §17 of the Building Inspector's determination <br /> This is a Declaratory Judgment action to deter- of the building setback line for the property of the co- <br /> mine the rights and responsibilities of the parties rela- defendant located on a cul de sac at 12 Brookside <br /> tive to a parcel of land located at 966 Falmouth Road <br /> (Lot 2),Mashpee. The Defendant filed Counterclaims Circle and the ZBA's affirmation of that determine- <br /> tion. The case entails a dispute over interpretation of <br /> against the Town for Declaratory Judgment and <br /> Injunctive Relief. The parties filed Cross-Motions for the location of the "building line" shown on the final <br /> approved plan for the subject property. We have filed <br /> Summary Judgment with the Land Court. A hearin <br /> g a Notice of Appearance on behalf of the ZBA and <br /> on said Motions was convened in the Land Court on Building Inspector and plan to engage in a joint <br /> December 2, 2011. We are currently awaiting the <br /> Court's Decision. defense of the ZBA decision with counsel for the <br /> property owner. A Land Court case management con- <br /> Mash nee Building Inspector/Zoning Agent v ference was held on September 19, 2011. <br /> T_)ragiannop lous <br /> Barnstable Superior Court C.A.No.2011-00248 We are honored to serve as Town Counsel for the <br /> This case involves a zoning violation/enforce- Town of Mashpee, and we remain committed to pro- <br /> ment action pursuant to the provisions of G.L. c. 40A, viding the Town with high quality, cost-effective,and <br /> §8 and the Town of Mashpee Zoning Bylaws relative timely legal advice and representation. We look for- <br /> to property located at 593 Main Street.The Complaint ward to working with the Town Manager, the <br /> was served upon the Defendant on May 12, 2011.The Selectmen, and other officers, boards and agencies of <br /> Defendant filed an Answer to this action on June 1, the Town to secure and advance the interests of the <br /> 2011.The Town has filed a Motion for Injuctive Relief Town of Mashpee in 2012. <br /> to enjoin any ongoing violations, and the Building Respectfully submitted, <br /> Inspector is currently monitoring activity at the locus. <br /> Patrick J. Costello, Esq. <br /> ! Louison, Costello, Condon & Pfaff,LLP <br /> I <br /> Town Counsel <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.