Laserfiche WebLink
;9 <br /> 9� <br /> Page 27 . Annual Towm Meeting - March 6th, 1973 ' <br /> F <br /> �3 <br /> Article 62 Continued: <br /> Homeyer: We have already spent $25,000.00 for Assessors Maps. <br /> It was said that the town would pick up enough money to pay for <br /> it. There are records of land court proceedings in the case of <br /> Mashpee Land all the time . I know it is mostly land of owners <br /> unknown. I think we should put a stop to it. <br /> Town Attorney: There was a question about the money being <br /> included in an amendment to this Article. If you have no <br /> challenge, you have no problem. However, ten tax-payers can get <br /> together and sue the Town to prevent you from using this money, <br /> if they care to do so. And they could stop us. I don't think that <br /> ten will sue . However, this Article is certainly sufficently, <br /> unclear. <br /> Gordon: I think it should be brought in Special Town <br /> Meeting. This is similar to another Article regarding property. <br /> Yet no money has been appropriated for the extra clerical help <br /> etc. <br /> Ehrisman: This is merely postponing something which ought <br /> to have been done a long time ago. Barnstable made this research <br /> and picked up land valued upward to--two million dollars . Parcels <br /> had been listed as owners unknown. This shouldn't be postponed. <br /> I talked to you about this, Garland, when you made your pitch for <br /> re-election at the New Seabury Country Club. <br /> Moderator: Electioneering is out. <br /> Homeyer: I go along with Green. Get with your Town Counsel <br /> and have this thing ready for the mext Town Meeting. <br /> Woman From the Audience : Isn't there a motion before us? <br /> Moderator: Yes, but not in the proper form. . <br /> Woman: Then I make a motion that Article 62 be tabled. <br /> This was seconded. <br /> Moderator: Your motion was in improper form because no <br /> choice has been made whether it Was to be raised and appropriated <br /> or taken from available funds , therefore your amended Article and <br /> motion was not right. <br />