Laserfiche WebLink
O'1Nn O ,MaS�t +2e TCannin Board <br /> 16 great-%eck RoadXorth. <br /> ,Mashpee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> Sections 3,4,5-overall suggestion on what our approach to details and materials, landscape patterns, <br /> supported framework, wastewater, sustainability, and solar investments, <br /> Lastly, refers to a portion at the end about design review. There has to be a process where the vision is <br /> seen collectively as a community, which will ensure that we arrived where we anticipated. Vision equals <br /> reality. <br /> Ms. Cox asked if there were any initial questions, comments, or feedback. <br /> Mr. Balzarini doesn't understand on page 7, the alleyway minimum setback of four feet, in the rear <br /> setback no feet, then page 21 it says 20 feet. What is the four feet on page 7 mean? Also on page 2, <br /> who is zoning enforcement officer? Could he make minor changes outside of the Planning Board? <br /> Mr. Kallfelze described page 7 as being the setback for the building to the edge of the alley. Page 21 <br /> defines the size/width of the alley, <br /> Mr. Lehrer commented that the Zoning Enforcement Officer is the Building Commissioner. <br /> Ms. Cox called up the definitions in the zoning bylaw, that's where uses are described, definitions for all <br /> uses and examples of what may fall within those categories. Not unusual in zoning bylaws that the <br /> Building Commissioner is the Zoning Officer, has to allow the use being consistent with zoning. Zoning <br /> cannot vision every type of use looking 25 years ahead, but that it falls in the zoning bylaw categories. <br /> The bylaw sets the criteria for minor/major changes that would appear before the Town or not. <br /> Mr. Lehrer wanted to clarify the existing condition. The use table cannot possibly capture every possible <br /> use, for example there are a variety of contractor trades and sub uses that we cannot specifically list, <br /> the purpose is allow the Zoning Officer to make a honest assessment of what is proposed and make a <br /> general assessment, does not have anything relative to minor or major changes, only regard to building <br /> permits as filed. <br /> Mr. Balzarini also doesn't understand the 4.5 stories to 3.5, he doesn't understand what the half a <br /> story? <br /> Mr. Kallfelze alluded to the definitions that are allotted for this. A half story could be a roof with dormers <br /> in it, or a building three stories with the rooftop is a half story, that half story could be occupied. He <br /> mentioned this being an important conversation, they have already considered that the peak of the roof <br /> was considered in measurements. It can be presented in detail down the road. <br /> Mr. Chace elaborated that a roof deck provided and the half of story could be excess elevator or <br /> stairways for half footprint and is utilized in many places. <br /> Mr. Callahan's most important issues are housing and wastewater. There is a proposed 1,700 units, of <br /> those, is there a commitment over and above the minimum standard already established? And would <br /> there be production over the minimum? <br /> Ms. Cox referenced page 10 Subsection N, the requirement will be 10% restricted for affordable <br /> housing. <br /> 10 <br />