My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/02/2021 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
06/02/2021 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:00:39 PM
Creation date
6/16/2021 2:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/02/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
u�v urn nry:. <br /> 421 f <br /> lashvee Aannin ward~ <br /> oj'.idrtry,. <br /> 16 Great Neck M)ad.Xorth <br /> 'Mashyee, Nassa.cGrusetts 02649 <br /> the site, but it is constrained by sand beds and infiltration of the discharge. Offsite discharge needs to <br /> be explored. The State mandate of 180,000 gallons is based on Title V capacity. The Title V measures <br /> number of gallons based on use. We have the ability to expand another 100,000 gallons, we can use <br /> 180,000 gallons before we trigger the next expansion. With expansion to 280,000, we will be allowed to <br /> take it to 80% until you have threshold for further expansion. Likely the discussions around the <br /> wastewater treatment plant will involve expansion. <br /> Mr. Phelan asked if there was a plan to demolish current buildings or leave them as is. With the <br /> construction, is the initial focus going to be on commercial and industrial or housing as part of initial <br /> phases? <br /> Mr. Chace commented there are no plans to tear down or demo any existing properties. As part of the <br /> first phases, housing will be a primary focus. <br /> Ms. Waygan reiterated there were no plans to demo of existing buildings, but will this zoning allow for <br /> demo or expansion of areas already built? Can that extra capacity be taken out of the bylaw? <br /> Ms. Cox stated it would. If the existing building complies with the new zoning then it could be expanded <br /> in accordance with new zoning, or if building does not comply, subsection J...(she was cut off) <br /> Ms. Waygan asked for slide review of existing zoning C1. Is there any way they can get the build out <br /> including the chapter 40b development and the OSID bylaw? We need to look at existing and new <br /> zoning, which would be helpful. Basic question about uses in the bylaw, this is an overlay district. Does <br /> it draw on the list of uses? <br /> Ms. Cox said it has its own uses in definitions section. Page 11, commercial use, and then a list of what <br /> would constitute a commercial use. <br /> Ms. Waygan asked if they are using form based code. <br /> Ms. Cox said it is a hybrid because uses are less regulated in current zoning, so it is a combination of <br /> existing and form based. Regulatory plan as part of Development Agreement process, for the zoning <br /> there is no associated regulatory plan. Certain areas would be regulated in terms of open space where <br /> streets would be located, and those would be part of the Development Agreement process. Part of <br /> Development Agreement has to allow for flexibility as this spans over 25 years. Don't have specific <br /> plans or how it will lay out or even location of lots, street networks, and open areas. <br /> Ms. Waygan is working off of a list from August of 2018. It was the Planning Boards previous time spent <br /> before conversation ended with Mashpee Commons, but not before there was a submission of <br /> questions. Is there a regulating plan, for example, previously we asked about parking? Is there a <br /> financial impact assessment? What are the minimum and maximum building heights? What are the <br /> minimum and maximum residential densities?What is the commercial square footage? What permits <br /> will be needed for waste water treatment to handle maximum build out? Will you be doing an <br /> environmental impact statement? <br /> Ms. Cox stated the economic analysis has been submitted, it is part of the Development Agreement <br /> application, already prepared and packaging the materials to submit to Cape Cod Commission and <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.