Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Lehrer confirmed that the next step involved establishing site control with the Town through <br /> a long term ground lease, according to the terms of the RFP, and then pursue permitting through <br /> Chapter 40B with the Zoning Board of Appeals. For the benefit of the members of the public <br /> attending the meeting, Mr. Lehrer explained that the project was not yet permitted, and that, once <br /> an application was received, abutters would be legally noticed and could then share their <br /> comments in a formal setting during the Public Hearing. <br /> Members of the public expressed concern that it would be too late for them to express their <br /> concerns. Chairman Isbitz responded that the development process was lon occurriilg over <br /> several years, and there would be anilLIc o,L)o at ftiture Committee <br /> _p <br /> and 'i-rust meetings. He also added that the selection of POAH-HAC as the designated developer <br /> was basedji�i �arl Burin the course of <br /> pLirt on their re.)Litation for meetingwith nei lb( s ej,)ul-i- <br /> .......... <br /> jevql,Qlarr� the project rrr�d wor'kJ ng conscientiously to address their concerns. CAiai-r-man4-4-ii-t-z- <br /> 2-ha <br /> housi e 11 s 04f tlie-�eotni ir4uf tht-toted that t . ..... t-was-rv-spon,4W�r <br /> e0ordinating-the-proeess I,--- *-.,,-I,etitifyvoteti-tif�kvffoi--(4able hoti <br /> Abbott inquired whether a contractor had been identified and whether it could be changed, but <br /> Mr. Lehrer was unsure. <br /> Chairman Isbitz continued to described for the public the timeline,the Chapter 30B procurement <br /> process and involvement of staff members and Committee and Trust members in drafting the <br /> RFP, including consideration of issues of the Town and wastewater matters, leading UltirliateN tO <br /> a review of the submitted proposals the selection of <br /> POAH, and co-developer HAC_jq_Maur. -.44ie-G <br /> e0fls:A 4 1, ... 11 a-fi nal <br /> ..efe-, Hi had been feq e-%ted-i+i-d <br /> pfopofia4)y-t4iL-AlfordaWe44o"ng <br /> Mr. Lehrer confirmed that he had met with a number of residents to address questions, but had <br /> also developed a document to address frequently addressed questions,which he distributed <br /> amongst the attendees, Mr. Lehrer confirmed that Cooper Street would not be improved. Mr. <br /> Lehrer discussed the specifics of the three parcels, confirming that Parcel C would not be <br /> developed. In response to an attendee's concern, Chairman Isbitz reiterated that an engineer <br /> conducted a feasibility study for the property and determined that environmental concerns <br /> limited the size of the development to no more than 69 bedrooms. A portion of the site would <br /> need to be reserved for nitrogen mitigation,specifics o Parcel C (94-7),the back 7 acres, <br /> would not be built, as identified in the RFP,to limit environmental and neighbor impacts. The <br /> Chair noted that one of the proposals suggested building on both Parcel A and B, while POAH <br /> wished to build on the least amount of land possible, and chose to build on Parcel A, placing an <br /> advanced waste removal system on Parcel B (93-6). It was confirmed that access to the site <br /> would be fi-orn,Route 28 at the location of South Cape Resort. It was confirmed that Cooper <br /> Street would become a finished Load Lip-to where it currently ends. ed. <br /> Susie Milly, Taurus Drive, inquired about the initial identification of the site, The Chair <br /> confirmed that a number of sites and been considered and Mr. Abbott responded that the <br /> Committee had worked for approximately 10 years to identify town owned parcels large enough <br />