My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/13/2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
11/13/2019 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2021 5:01:53 PM
Creation date
10/29/2021 3:10:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/13/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />DECISION APPEAL OF ZONING/BUILDING OFFICIAL <br />Petitioners, John and Susan Fish <br />RE: 89 Industrial Drive (Map 88 Parcel 27) <br />Mashpee, MA 02649 <br />AP-2019-5 5 <br />Mr. Blaisdell met with Town Counsel and the Building Department for their advice on this <br />case. Mr. Blaisdell said that they discussed the legality of the issue, and that Town <br />Counsel's opinion was that there was no reason to overturn the Building Inspector's <br />decision based on the cease and desist letter, and allows the Zoning Board to make their <br />own decisions. The application did not reference a specific bylaw. <br />Attorney Senie said that his original request was Section 174-9 and Section 174-22. <br />Mr. Gould said in his opinion, this case was presented regarding the activities going on, <br />and whether it required or didn't require various permits; the violations seem to be a <br />secondary issue. Attorney Senie said that there was an intent that the MIPT and the CCC <br />do everything they can to preserve the 50 ft. no -touch buffer at the end of the commercial <br />zone. He said he presented this to show the historical context. <br />There were no more questions from the Board. Mr. Blaisdell asked Charlie based on the <br />refusal to issue the cease and desist, if the owners were to come to the Board and are now <br />operating some kind of use of the lot without coming to the Board for a Special Permit and <br />had nothing to do with the 50 ft. buffer would he have a problem issuing a cease and desist. <br />Charlie said; no he wouldn't, if they started using the property. The lot was already in use, <br />and it doesn't look like it was designed for parking purposes. Charlie said that he believes <br />that this was presented regarding the 50 ft. buffer of the private agreement. <br />Mr. Fish and his mother addressed the Board and expressed what they observed on the <br />property. They believe there's a violation of the buffer and feel they were harassed by the <br />new owners. <br />There were no more comments from the audience or the Board. <br />Mr. Blaisdell announced that a motion is made in the positive, and then the Board votes. <br />Mr. Blaisdell made a motion to approve Petitioners, John and Susan Fish's request to <br />overturn the Zoning/Building Official's determination regarding a cease and desist order <br />letter dated September 24, 2019. Mr. Gould second. <br />Chairman Furbush polled the Board. Mr. Blaisdell, voted no, Mr. Gould, voted no, Ms. <br />Sangeleer voted no, Mr. Ganzenmuller voted no, and Mr. Furbush voted no. The Board <br />hereby concludes that the Petitioners have not established a factual or legal basis to support <br />their appeal of the Zoning/Building Official's determination. The Zoning Board of Appeals <br />votes unanimously to deny the appeal, and uphold the Zoning/Building Official's <br />determination regarding a cease and desist order letter dated September 24, 2019. <br />S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.