My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/24/2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
02/24/2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2023 10:50:50 AM
Creation date
11/9/2021 3:18:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/24/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION: DENIAL OF AN APPEAL OF <br /> THE BUILDING OFFICIAL'S DECISION <br /> Petitioner, Jonathan M. Polloni, Esquire <br /> Malcolm E. MacDonald, Trustee of <br /> The MacDonald Land Trust <br /> 11 Valley Road(Map 50 Parcel 13) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> AP-2021-20 <br /> He believes that they were not held in common ownership with any adjoining land because <br /> lot 70 and lot 275 are actually separate lots that have their own identity apart from the <br /> trailer park. He provided the deeds dated 1973, for lot 270, and the other deed dated 1974 <br /> for lot 275. He said there are no other deeds depicting they were together. He provided <br /> separate deeds, and the assessors' cards showing that they are developable lots. Mr. <br /> MacDonald has owned these lots for 46 years, and paying taxes as developable land. <br /> Attorney Polloni provided the Briarwood subdivision plan that was created back in 1970. <br /> He said that these lots are noticeably separate from the Trailer Park. These lots have never <br /> been used in connection with the trailer park since purchased back in 1973. That is the <br /> intent that the lot owner was surprised that these lots should be included with the trailer <br /> park when he felt they were always separate and existed outside of the trailer park. He <br /> referenced Town Counsel's email regarding the "merger doctrine". Attorney Polloni <br /> believes that combining these lots as indicated by the Building Commissioner with the <br /> trailer park does not make them more conforming, and then would be considered part of <br /> the trailer park. <br /> Mr. MacDonald addressed the Board and discussed the history of the area that is located <br /> north of Johns Pond and along a portion of Moody Pond. He said that the Otis Trailer Park <br /> was developed under the title MacDonald Land Trust. Otis Trailer Village (OTV) was <br /> owned separately to protect the land from legal action against the business of OTV. He was <br /> further advised that MacDonald Land Trust could be used for future real estate transaction <br /> and could sell the two lots. He wanted advice on how to resolve the matter of these two <br /> vacant lots. <br /> Chairman Furbush mentioned that the application is to appeal the Building <br /> Commissioner's Decision regarding both lots. This information was sent to Town Counsel, <br /> who sent a three page email (dated November 30, 2020), to the building officials with his <br /> determination. Mr. Furbush read the last line of the email stating; "the subsequent merger <br /> of these lots into common ownership with the OTV trailer park would have terminated any <br /> such grandfathering protections."He also read and email dated February 19,2021 from the <br /> Building Commissioner who agrees with the Building Official and Town Counsel. The <br /> Board agreed that these lots are merged, and they are bound by the laws of the State. <br /> In view of the foregoing,the Board hereby concludes that the Petitioner has not established <br /> a basis to support the appeal of the Building Official's determination. Upon motion duly <br /> made and seconded,the Zoning Board of appeals voted unanimously at the Public Hearing <br /> on February 24, 2021 to DENY the appeal and uphold the Building Official's Decision <br /> regarding his enforcement jurisdiction with respect to the status of the unbuildable lots. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.