Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee <br /> 16 Great JVeck&ad Xorth <br /> Mashpee,Massachusetts 02649 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT <br /> SP-2021-41 <br /> Michael J. Ronhock Bk.: 31084 <br /> and Teresa A. Ronhock Pg.: 279 <br /> 104 Degrass Road <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> A Petition was filed on June 1, 2021 by Owners, Michael J. Ronhock and Teresa A. <br /> Ronhock requesting a Special Permit under §174-17.1 of the Zoning Bylaws to allow for a <br /> raze and replace of a pre-existing, non-conforming two bedroom dwelling, and replace it <br /> with a new three bedroom dwelling and a detached garage on property located in an R-3 <br /> Zoning District, at 104 Degrass Road, Map 104 Parcel 18, Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter <br /> 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a newspaper of general <br /> circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on May 28, 2021 and June 4,2021 a copy of which is <br /> attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the provisions of <br /> Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §9 and the Town of Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Public Hearings were held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on Wednesday, June <br /> 23, 2021 at which time the following members of the Board of Appeals were present and <br /> acting throughout; Chairman,Jonathan Furbush,Vice Chairman, William Blaisdell,Board <br /> Members, Ron Bonvie, Scott Goldstein, and Norman J. Gould. <br /> Mike Ronhock represented himself for the raze and replace project. The existing structure <br /> was built in 1968 and is currently in compliance with the setbacks, so there are no non- <br /> conforming situations except for the frontage. The new building will be set in the same <br /> footprint and will comply with all setback criteria. The proposed lot coverage is 5%. The <br /> current building has a cement block foundation, and is not safe enough to add any new <br /> construction. He submitted letters from his abutters in support of his project. There was a <br /> new four bedroom septic system installed. The Board of Health Agent commented that he <br /> could expand the septic system to allow for a fifth bedroom capacity. <br /> The Board had a discussion regarding the detached garage on the site plan that noted a <br /> future accessory apartment, but did not depict the setback distance line from Parcel 1. The <br /> Board also reviewed the architectural plans, and questioned the craft's room having a 4 ft. <br /> cased opening.After review,the Board decided to continue the hearing requesting a revised <br /> site plan to depict the setback distance from the garage to Parcel 1. They also requested a <br /> revised architectural plan because the Board of Health Agent would most likely request <br /> that the craft's room depict a 6 ft. opening. <br /> 1 <br />