Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> JUNE 8, 2016 <br /> 29 & 33 Trinity Place: Owner, Cotuit Solar, LLC requests to construct a warehouse and <br /> renovate an existing building for a solar energy business and obtain relief from paving <br /> requirements under §174-31 and §174-41 of the Zoning By-laws on property located in a <br /> C-2 Zoning District, (formerly 36 Savannas Path), (Map 62 Parcel 68B), Mashpee, MA. <br /> To re-establish the previously granted Variance (V-2014-35) that was granted on <br /> December 14, 2014 that expired. <br /> Attorney Kevin Kirrane represented the applicant, Mr. Geyser of Cotuit Solar, who needs <br /> to re-establish his variance request that expired. Mr. Kirrane said that the road has been <br /> constructed and paved which was required by the Planning Board, and is also required to <br /> apply for a building permit. The plan depicts an existing 2-story building on the lot that <br /> will be utilized as office space, and a proposed 40' x 105' warehouse to be used as storage <br /> for the solar business equipment. The project also includes to supply twelve (12) parking <br /> spaces, with a gravel surface. <br /> The proposed warehouse will be setback 75 feet from the front yard setback, 50 feet from <br /> the rear yard setback,24 feet from Savannas Path,and 38 feet from the residential R-5 zone <br /> toward the back. <br /> Mr. Bonvie read comments into the record submitted by Charlie Rowley, Engineer <br /> representing the Town regarding his inspections of the site, drainage, and road <br /> construction. <br /> Mr. Goldstein read comments into the record from the Board of Health. "No comments <br /> necessary". <br /> Mr. Blaisdell read comments into the record from the Town Planner regarding the time <br /> limit for the road construction. <br /> Mr. Furbush read comments from the Inspection Department into the record. <br /> The Board questioned Mr. Geyser who supplied a revised drawing of the proposed <br /> warehouse that depicted a much larger sized building than what was approved back in <br /> 2014. <br /> Mr. Geyser told the Board that the initial drawings that were submitted were for the <br /> building size that was subsequently modified requested by the Planning Board. He said the <br /> Board does not have a set of engineered drawings for the size building that exists on the <br /> approved plan. <br /> Mr. Furbush said that the Board approved the height of the building at 18' 3",not a 30 foot <br /> building. <br /> 5 <br />