Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> John A. Hayden and Janet L. Hayden <br /> 26 Cross Tree Way(Map 112 Parcel 24) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> FINDING-2015-30 <br /> • not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non-conforming <br /> structure or use to the neighborhood, <br /> • and, that there is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking and setbacks <br /> as may be required. <br /> Although said Finding shall not constitute a Special Permit as defined by the <br /> General laws and this By-law, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall follow the procedures <br /> specified in the General Laws for Special Permits in processing requests for such Findings. <br /> Per Town Counsel: Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws for a Finding of Fact Cannot <br /> involve a Variance in the Decision/Finding of Fact. No such thing as "use variance". The <br /> Decision must be rendered in two separate statements/decisions if a Variance or Special <br /> Permit is involved along with a Written Finding. <br /> The Board determined that: <br /> 1. The proposal will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing non- <br /> conforming structure or use to the neighborhood. <br /> 2. The proposal will be an improvement to the lot and is similar in size and character <br /> to other existing structures in the neighborhood. <br /> 3. The proposed additions, based upon the plans submitted to the Board, will be <br /> consistent with applicable State and Town statues, regulations, bylaws and plans, <br /> complies with the dimensional requirements applicable to the lot under current <br /> provisions of §174-31 (Land Space Requirements Table Footnotes) #18 of the <br /> Popponesset Overly District, or for lots which have been developed pursuant to <br /> §174-21, complies with such requirements as were applicable to initial construction <br /> of the dwelling under provisions of§174-21 Nonconforming lots. <br /> 4. Construction of the dwelling is contingent upon Board of Health final approval. <br /> 5. Construction of the dwelling will conform to current building code requirements. <br /> 6. There is adequate land area to provide sufficient parking and setbacks as may be <br /> required. <br /> In view of the foregoing, the Board determined the Petitioner met the criteria for a <br /> Written Finding. Upon motion duly made and seconded at the Public Hearings on <br /> Wednesday, August 26, 2015, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to issue a <br /> Written Finding stating that the proposed addition is not more non-conforming than what <br /> currently exists. The applicant is required to obtain Conservation approval for the sunroom <br /> prior to the issuance of a building permit. Conservation approved the proposed addition <br /> only. Referencing a Site Plan prepared for John Hayden of 26 Cross Tree Way, Mashpee, <br /> MA. By J.E. Landers-Cauley, P.E., Civil Engineering, PO Box 364 West Falmouth, MA. <br /> ASS. #112-24,Date: 05/07/15, Scale: 1"= 10',Drawn by: JDR,Job No. 2465PROP, Sheet <br /> 1 of 1, Rev. 07/23/15. Also a set of plans Al &A2 drawn by Cotuit Bay Design LLC, 43 <br /> Brewster Road, Mashpee, MA. Scale: 1/4" = IT". Titled; New Addition, Hayden <br /> Residence, dated 7/21/2015. <br /> 3 <br />