My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/22/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
>
04/22/2015 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2023 3:34:17 PM
Creation date
1/14/2022 1:21:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Decision
Meeting Date
04/22/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />DECISION FOR A VARIANCE <br />Richard R. Manganiello and Jennifer D. Manganiello <br />56 Kim Path (Map 117 Parcel 97) <br />Mashpee, MA 02649 <br />V-2015-12 <br />Mr. Furbush read a comment from the Conservation Agent into the record; "any <br />excavation required to install proposed shed will require a permit application to the <br />commission." <br />The Board continued the hearing until Wednesday, June 10, 2015. <br />GENERAL CRITERIA: <br />The subject property located at 56 Kim Path is approximately 6,552 square feet. <br />The Board received letters from the following abutters; Beth Prunier McGinnis, at <br />50 Kim Path and John & Christine Mizzi at 54 Kim Path who did not have any concerns <br />for the proposed shed. ' <br />Mr. Jim Candito, 70 Nick Trail spoke to the Board and provided photos of the area <br />stating the shed would bock his scenic view and stated he would like the shed moved back <br />6 feet from the side. <br />Mr. Kirrane stated the shed will be placed closer to the house and away from the <br />is property line at the 5 ft. requirement. It might be possible to move it closer to the home <br />however that would require another filing for relief request of the back lot line. Where <br />there's only 3 ft. between the house and the placement, it would be too close to the house. <br />VARIANCE CRITERIA: <br />Chapter 40A: Section 10. Variances: <br />The authority specifically finds that owing to circumstances relating to the soil <br />conditions, shape, or topography of such land or structures and especially affecting such <br />land or structures but not affecting generally the zoning district in which it is located, 1) a <br />literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance or by-law would involve substantial <br />hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner or appellant, and that 2) desirable relief <br />may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or <br />substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of such ordinance or by-law. <br />In view of the foregoing, the Board determined the Petitioner met the criteria for a <br />Variance. Upon motion duly made and seconded at the Public Hearings on Wednesday, <br />June 10, 2015, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to issue the applicants a <br />Variance for lot coverage relief of 2.9%. For the record, the lot coverage prior to this filing, <br />and at the time of the raze and replace of the home was 24.1% and is now 22.9%. Also <br />referencing the department and abutter letters. This motion is based on a plot plan issued <br />by Cape & Islands Engineering, Stamped by Christopher Costa PLS, dated 5/29/15, <br />proposed shed relocated, for Richard R. Manganiello, 56 Kim Path, Mashpee, MA. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.