My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/08/2014 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
01/08/2014 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2023 4:14:07 PM
Creation date
1/19/2022 12:11:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Decision
Meeting Date
01/08/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
any building housing livestock or poultry is not less than fifty (50) feet from the <br /> property boundary." Mr. Cook's project is not eligible under this provision <br /> because "livestock" is defined as "farm animals", see Oxford Dictionary, and <br /> Mr. Cook's facility is not a "farm." Furthermore, if Mr. Cook's project is <br /> eligible for consideration under this provision, Mr. Cools is not allowed to <br /> proceed as a matter of right as his project would require a Special Permit. <br /> This segues to the Residents Group's next contention. Section 174-24(J) <br /> of the Bylaw provides that "[w]here a use is not specifically listed in Section <br /> 174-25 Table of Use Regulations, said use may be allowed if a finding is made <br /> by the Zoning Board of Appeals that said use may be allowed in a specific <br /> district on the basis that it is substantially similar in its construction, operation, <br /> traffic and environmental impact to a specific use allowed as of right or by <br /> special permit in said district and it is substantially dissimilar from any uses <br /> prohibited in the district." Aquaculture is substantially dissimilar from <br /> agriculture. Consequently, Mr. Cools is not eligible to seek relief under Section <br /> 174-24(J). Furthermore, even if the activity were substantially similar to a <br /> permitted activity, Mr. Cook's proposal does not meet the area requirements <br /> (i.e., 5 acres). <br /> Even if Mr. Cook's proposal is eligible for consideration under Section <br /> 174-24(J), he cannot proceed with his proposal as a matter or right. He would <br /> be required to seek relief from the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br /> C. The Proposed Aquaculture Grant Is Prohibited By Section 174-62 <br /> Of The Zoning Bylaw Which Forbids Development In V-Zones <br /> Below The High Water Mark. <br /> Article XI, Section 174-62 of the Zoning Bylaw prohibits development of <br /> land in V Zones below the reach of mean high tide. In pertinent part, Section <br /> 174-62 provides: <br /> No land within areas designed (sic) as V (velocity) Zones on the <br /> Flood Insurance Administration Flood Rate Maps shall be <br /> developed unless such development is demonstrated by the <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.