My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/20/2005 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
>
04/20/2005 PLANNING BOARD Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2022 4:18:46 PM
Creation date
1/19/2022 2:22:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
PLANNING BOARD
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
been applied to and is consistent with other <br /> projects/developments within the Town. <br /> It was the consensus of the Board to approve the <br /> condition as written, they were not inclined to loner the <br /> nitrogen levels due to the location of the project. <br /> The Chairman recognized Rich claytor, Hors-ley Witten <br /> Group, who made reference to information/data provided <br /> regarding the nitrex system that does show the proposed <br /> s rstem ,will come in below 5 nag per liter effluent . <br /> Mr. Claytor spoke: to samples taken in the winter <br /> months . He explained the state permit is a Title <br /> regulation, 1.9 milligrams per liter. The nitrogen credit <br /> for this project is to design a system that meets 19 rig per <br /> liter. All evidence provided indicates the number will be <br /> substantially less than 19,' and more than likely <br /> substantially less than to mg per liter. <br /> Mr. Claytor stated this does drain into Popponesset <br /> Bay, and that this particular tributary according to the <br /> Brian Howes study, does not require - - discharge. Because <br /> this is not an operated wastewater treatment plant, h <br /> requested io mg per liter measured out of the pipe, or at <br /> the downstream property' lime. t the monitoring well, at <br /> r below. He made reference to the water quality report <br /> submitted at the last meeting for Staff/Board review. <br /> The Board agreed that if 5 mg is required and the <br /> numbers come in higher, the Board would have the <br /> opportunity to review the situation and request Applicant <br /> to mare the necessary corrections . The Board would not be <br /> inclined to revoke the permit, but would require <br /> adjustments and improvements be made at the plant. <br /> The chairman expl.a,ined her concern to limit the amount <br /> of nitrogen going into the groundwater. <br /> Mr. claytor explained the proposed system is a passive <br /> treatment system, it is not an operated wastewater <br /> treatment plant. . There are procedures that will increase <br /> the treatment efficiency. <br /> The Chairman commented that nitrogen is a major <br /> concern regarding this project, an-d that she would like to <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.