Laserfiche WebLink
T wn of Nlashpee <br /> o <br /> 16 C.rhat-Vcck koad A'i tlt <br /> )K,1slzpee,t�Lassachwctts 0N649 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A MINOR MODIFICATION <br /> TO THE WRITTEN FINDING (2014-41) <br /> FINDING-2014-60 <br /> Paul C. Trane Book#: 28418 Page 121 <br /> 124 Summersea Road <br /> (Map 105-Parcel 53) <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> A request for a minor modification was filed on December 1, 2014 by Paul C. <br /> Trane, Petitioner to revise the front setback of the previously approved Written Finding <br /> dated August, 27, 2014 for a new single-family dwelling. <br /> Notice was not required for a minor modification in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General Laws Chapter 40A. <br /> Public Hearings were held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> Wednesday, December 14, 2014 at which time the following members of the Board of <br /> Appeals were present; Chairman,Jonathan Furbush,Vice Chairman,William A. Blaisdell, <br /> Clerk, Ronald Bonvie, Board Member, James Reiffarth, and Associate Members, Scott <br /> Goldstein, and Domingo DeBarros. Also present was Building Commissioner, Michael <br /> Mendoza. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §6 and the Town of Mashpee <br /> Zoning By-laws. <br /> Mr. Tim Luff, of Archi-Tech Associates, represented the Petitioner and presented <br /> the revised plan. He stated the foundation was poured and the contractor asked for the as- <br /> built. BSS Design stamped the plan for the contractor who brought the as-built to the <br /> Building Inspector;the plans did not match the as-built.The reason the plans did not match <br /> is because the foundation plan was edited to a red line process, and the bay window bump- <br /> out in the front was altered to make a roof line work. The person who altered the plans <br /> didn't realize he actually pushed the bay window 6 inches closer to the street. The plan that <br /> was approved depicted 18 feet in the front and the as-built depicts 17.6 feet. <br /> Mr. Luff stated that under the Bylaw Table of Contents for §714-31 Land Space <br /> Requirements Table, Footnote 6; "A dwelling need not be setback more than the average <br /> of the setbacks of dwellings on the lots adjacent to either side."The plan from the previous <br /> file shows the adjacent homes, the left side is 23.7' and 3.7 setbacks. The math would be <br /> an average setback of 15.55. <br /> 1 <br />