Laserfiche WebLink
, ,1)fSNr Town cj'Nasl ee <br /> �Anj aG G�•c�at��ec�, l�t�acl�_Mq�•th <br /> � �1n�h.pee,Massarrluuyetts 026.49 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR WITHDRAWAL <br /> PETITION FOR A WRITTEN FINDING <br /> FINDING-2013-28 <br /> Petitioner: Peter Michaelson Certificate of Title: 28392 <br /> 24 Shipwreck Drive Book#2167 Page 217 <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> Map 76 Parcel 56 <br /> (Owner of Record: Francis E. DeMaio) <br /> A Petition was filed on July 17, 2013 by Peter Michaelson requesting a <br /> Written Finding under Section 174-17 of the Zoning By-laws and M.G.L. Chapter <br /> 40A §6 concerning continuance, extension or alteration of a pre-existing, non- <br /> conforming structure to allow for construction of a new single-family dwelling on <br /> property located in an R-3 Zoning District at 24 Shipwreck Drive, (Map 76 Parcel <br /> 56), Mashpee, MA. (Owner of Record: Francis E. DeMaio). <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee <br /> Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on July 26, <br /> 2013 and August 2,2013 a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> On August 14, 2013, Public Hearings were held on this Petition at the <br /> Mashpee Town Hall at which time the following Board members were present, <br /> Jonathan D.Furbush,William A.Blaisdell,James Reiffarth,Ronald S.Bonvie, and <br /> Associate Members, Domingo K. DeBarros, and Richard Jodka. Also present was <br /> Richard Morgan, Building Commissioner. Board Member John M. Dorsey was <br /> absent. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provision of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §9 and the Town of <br /> Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Steve Cook, of Cotuit Bay Design represented the Petitioner, Peter <br /> Michaelson requesting to build a new 24 foot by 32 foot Cape Style home. The <br /> Board determined the petition filed under Section 174-17 was erroneous due to the <br /> fact the lot is vacant. <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> f <br />