Laserfiche WebLink
"ios+v <br /> Town (?f Mashpee <br /> ?ylasJipee, lassachusetts 0.64.9 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A WRITTIN FINDING <br /> FINDING-2013-37 <br /> Marjorie Hackett and Robert Hackett Title Reference: <br /> 10 Stanley Road Book: 27294, Page: 247 <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> Map 114 Parcel 88 <br /> A Petition was filed on August 16, 2013 by Marjorie Hackett and Robert Hackett <br /> requesting a Written Finding under Article V §174-17 of the Zoning By-laws and M.G.L. <br /> Chapter 40A §6 concerning continuance, extension or alteration of a pre-existing, non- <br /> conforming structure to raze and replace a dwelling on property located in an R3 Zoning <br /> District at 10 Stanley Road, (Map 114 Parcel 88), Mashpee, MA <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws <br /> Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a newspaper of <br /> general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on August 23, 2013 and August 30, 2013 a <br /> copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> On September 11, 2013 Public Hearings were held on this Petition at the Mashpee <br /> Town Hall at which time the following Board members were present, Vice Chairman, <br /> William A. Blaisdell, Clerk,Ronald S. Bonvie,Board Member,James Reiffarth,Associate <br /> Members, Domingo K. DeBarros, and Richard Jodka, and Building Commissioner, <br /> Richard Morgan. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provision of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §9 and the Town of Mashpee <br /> Zoning'By-laws. <br /> Attorney Kevin Kirrane represented Robert and Marjorie Hackett requesting to raze <br /> and replace an existing single-family home. He submitted updated plans since the filing <br /> date and has appended more accurate written remarks. <br /> The lot consists of 2,968 square feet and has approximately 72 feet of frontage <br /> along Stanley Road. The structure fails to conform to the front yard setback because it was <br /> built across the property line as is the rear setback which is 5.9 feet from the rear property <br /> line. It does conform on the westerly side and conforms on the easterly side where the <br /> proposed septic system will be located. The existing building is a 2-bedroom single-story <br /> residence and currently has an overall footprint of 769 square feet and a portion of the 68 <br /> square feet structure sits on the undeveloped way. <br /> 1 <br />