Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />MINUTES <br />APRIL 13, 2011 <br />The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals held Public Hearings on Wednesday, April 13, 2011 <br />at 7:00 p.m. (Conference Room #1) at the Mashpee Town Hall, 16 Great Neck Road North. <br />Board Members Robert G. Nelson, Jonathan D. Furbush, William A. Blaisdell, James <br />Reiffarth, John M. Dorsey and Associate Members Peter R. Hinden, Ronald S. Bonvie and <br />Judith M. Horton were present. Chairman Robert G. Nelson opened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. <br />and announced that the hearings were being televised live. <br />CONTINUED HEARINGS <br />Habitat for Humauitv of Cape Cod, Inc.: Requests a Comprehensive Permit under <br />Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40B to allow for construction of a single-family home <br />on property located at 24 Russell Road Map 120 Parcel 129A Mashpee, MA. Owner of <br />record: John L. and Cynthia J. West. Continued from February 9, February 23, and March 23, <br />2011 Public Hearings. <br />Sitting: Board Members Robert G. Nelson, Jonathan D. Furbush, William A. Blaisdell, John <br />M. Dorsey and Associate Member Ronald S. Bonvie. Board Member James Reiffarth stepped <br />down. <br />Attorney Warren Brodie referred to the site visit conducted on April 4, 2011 by ZBA <br />Chairman Robert G. Nelson, Building Commissioner Richard Stevens, Conservation <br />• Commission Agent Andrew McManus, Director of Permitting and Site Acquisition for <br />Habitat for Humanity, Donald Dickinson and Land Surveyor Robb Sykes. Attorney Brodie <br />said that the purpose of the site visit was to determine the precise location of the high tide line <br />on the lot where it abuts water. Mr. Nelson said that the Board was not challenging the <br />location of the high tide line. He reiterated that the Board is looking for a plan with a line <br />showing where the upland is. Mr. Nelson questioned the additional square feet calculation <br />with the dimension of 20.35 feet on the Russell Road side of the subject property compared to <br />the March 23, 2011 plan showing 14.79 feet on that side. <br />Mr. Sykes said that the site visit was not conducted to establish high water or wetland. He <br />said that the line on the March 23`d plan was a tie line, not a property line, not a high water <br />line. He said that the boundary along the tie line is indeterminate. Mr. Sykes said that he <br />located the line by instrument right after Mr. Nelson left the site. He said that Mr. McManus <br />stated that the high water line, which is the property line, is where the water touches the sand. <br />This is actually 15 feet closer to the water than where the stakes have been set. Mr. Nelson <br />said that the Board should have been informed that the line was going closer to the water than <br />what was shown on the previous plan. Mr. Nelson said that he does not agree with what is <br />shown on the plan because there is a bank on the property and the Board needs that second <br />line drawn on the plan indicating where the upland is. <br />Mr. Sykes said that wetland and bank have different definitions. He also stated that it's either <br />wetland or upland and they're on the same line. Mr. Nelson disagreed. Mr. Sykes said that <br />• Mr. McManus has determined that there is no wetland resource on this site. Mr. Bonvie said <br />that if there is no BVW inclusive of bank, etc. high water is the extent of upland. <br />