My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/25/2011 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
05/25/2011 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2022 2:49:58 PM
Creation date
1/25/2022 11:55:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />MAY 25, 2011 <br />MINUTES <br />• allowed in a specific district on the basis that it is substantially similar in its construction, <br />operation, traffic and environmental impact to a specific use allowed as of right or by special <br />permit in said district and it is substantially dissimilar in those respects from any uses <br />prohibited in the district." Attorney Costello said that this Section gives the Board the right <br />to vote in favor of a use (a boathouse) that is similar to a use that is allowed under the By- <br />laws. He also stated that the wording in the Decision could reflect the word "garage", even <br />though the proposal was advertised as a boathouse. <br />Mr. Nelson said that Overland Road is a 25 -foot wide paper street, not an 8 -foot wide road <br />as claimed by an abutter at the last public hearing. <br />Attorney Brian Wall represented Mr. Jack Carter, an abutter at 17 and 20 Monomoscoy <br />Road West. He said that the proposal is not allowed under 174-25.H(7) because it doesn't <br />meet the setbacks requirements; and therefore, is not eligible under Section 174-24J of the <br />By-laws. Attorney Wall said that he interprets lot coverage as met "and approved" as <br />meaning approval from the Planning Board and that it will comply with minimum zoning <br />requirements. <br />Attorney Costello said that Section 174-25.H.7 of the Zoning By-laws does give the Board <br />discretion to determine if a Variance could be granted. He quoted the By-law: "that all <br />applicable setbacks and lot coverage requirements are met and approved, that a special <br />permit for such use is approved by the Board of Appeals." Attorney Costello said that this <br />• section does not mention lot coverage "as set forth in the Table of Use Regulations". He <br />said that the filing seeking a Special permit and the Variance allows for permit issuance <br />under this By-law. <br />Mr. Costill said that he will be storing one boat and one vehicle inside the structure. After a <br />short discussion by the Board, Mr. Costill agreed to reduce the size and move/rotate the <br />location of the proposal. <br />Mr. Blaisdell made a motion to continue the Petitions until June 8, 2011 to allow for <br />submission of revised plans. Mr. Furbush seconded the motion. Mr. Nelson voted yes. Mr. <br />Furbush voted yes. Mr. Blaisdell voted yes. Mr. Reiffarth voted yes. <br />Jeremy N. Stevenson, et al, Trustees: Requests a Special Permit under Section 174-25.I(9) <br />to allow for construction of a pier, ramp and float that will extend across a total of more than <br />seventy feet of coastal beach, coastal bank, salt marsh or bordering vegetated wetlands on <br />property located in an R-3 zoning district at 431 Monomoscoy Road (Map 124 Parcel 53) <br />Mashpee, M.A. Not heard. Continued from May 11, 2011 at request of Petitioner to allow <br />for Conservation Commission approval. <br />Sitting: Board Members Robert G. Nelson, Jonathan D. Forbush, William A. Blaisdell, <br />Ronald S. Bonvie and Associate Member Judith M. Horton. Mr. Reiffarth stepped down. <br />• Mr. John Slavinsky of Cape & Islands Engineering represented the Petition and said that the <br />Shellfish Warden and Acting Harbormaster have approved the proposal. The Conservation <br />Commission has issued an Order of Conditions and is allowing a 36 -foot walkway over the <br />fragile marsh area along with relocation of the proposed dock. The proposal will extend a <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.