Laserfiche WebLink
ty <br />MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - <br />MINUTES <br />JUNE 8, 2011 <br />The Petitioner filed a Request for Determination of Applicability (RDA) with the <br />• Conservation Commission, which the Commission approved given the insignificant size <br />and impact of the proposal. <br />Mr. Reiffarth expressed his concern about footings being placed onto the retaining wall. <br />Mr. Dicataldo said that the footings will be placed close to the wall, not on it. The rest of <br />the deck will be cantilevered. He said that a rough calculation of the lot coverage comes to <br />20%. <br />Mr. Nelson said that four of the footings will be 10 feet from the concrete wall and two <br />will be 14 feet away. <br />Mr. Maintanis said that a deck can be cantilevered as long as it meets the building code. <br />After some discussion, the Board determined that it would not require submission of a <br />signed and stamped engineering plan from this Petitioner. <br />No comments were received from abutters. <br />Mr. Blaisdell made a motion to grant a Finding of Fact. Findings: The proposal is not <br />significantly more detrimental to the neighborhood than what currently exists. <br />Conservation Commission has approved the proposal. This Decision is conditioned upon <br />compliance with submitted plan entitled: "44 Little Neck Lane, Mr. Rich Miller". Mr. <br />Bonvie seconded the motion. Mr. Furbush voted yes. Mr. Bonvie voted yes. Mr. <br />• Reiffarth voted yes. Mr. Nelson voted yes. Mr. Blaisdell voted yes. Vote was unanimous. <br />Robert D. and Grace Varney: Request a Special Permit under Section 174-45.4 of the <br />Zoning By-laws for permission to construct an accessory apartment in an existing home on <br />property located in an R-5 zoning district at 64 Hilltop Road (Map 41 Parcel 56) Mashpee, <br />MA. <br />Sitting: Board Members Robert G. Nelson, Jonathan D. Furbush, William A. Blaisdell and <br />James Reiffarth, and Associate Member Judith M. Horton. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Varney attended the meeting to represent their Petition. Mr. Varney said that <br />their Petition meets all the requirements for grant of a Special Permit for an accessory <br />apartment. The accessory apartment will be constructed in the basement of the existing <br />home. At 517 square feet the proposal will be a little less than 33% of the total square <br />footage of the 1600 -square foot home. There are three means of egress for the apartment. <br />Mr. Nelson said that he visited the property and there is sufficient parking. He also said <br />that the property is immaculate and well -kept. He stated that the home's appearance is that <br />of a one -family home. <br />Mr. Maintanis explained that the Building Department keeps records of all homeowners <br />who have legalized their accessory apartments. The Building Department sends out <br />• notices and requires the homeowners to certify the accessory apartment on an annual basis. <br />E <br />