Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />MINUTES <br />JULY 27, 2011 <br />• Continued from June 22, 2011 Public Hearings at request of Petitioner. Opened, not <br />heard. <br />Stephen Berish, Trustee: Requests a Variance from Section 174-25.F.7 of the <br />Zoning By-laws to allow.for retail and service donut/pastry shop with accessory <br />drive-thru window on property located in a C -2/R-3 zoning district at 439 Nathan <br />Ellis Highway (Map 72 Parcel 23) Mashpee, MA. Continued from' June 22, 2011 <br />Public Hearings at request of Petitioner. Opened, not heard. <br />Mr. Furbush made a motion to continue the above -referenced Petitions until August <br />10, 2011. He also said that this will be the final continuance granted by the Board <br />and that the Petitioner must represent the Petitions on August 10, 2011 or the Board <br />will Deny them. Mr. Blaisdell seconded the motion. Mr. Nelson voted yes. Ms. <br />Horton voted yes. Mr. Bonvie voted yes. Mr. Reiffarth voted yes. Mr. Furbush <br />voted yes. Mr. Blaisdell voted yes. Vote was unanimous. <br />OTHER BUSINESS <br />Affordable Housing of New England v. Town of Mashpee Zoning Board of <br />Appeals: Review Site Plan and Definitive Plan of Land received from Town <br />Counsel concerning property located in an R-5 zoning district at 72 — 72A Main <br />Street, Mashpee MA. <br />• The Definitive Plan which is supposed to show the existing parking plan is dated and <br />signed in 2001. No handicap parking spaces are shown. Mr. White has altered an <br />original definitive plan by attaching a sticky note on it. <br />Item 6 of the Settlement Agreement reads: "AHA -NE must provide the existing <br />1980's parking plan to the Building Inspector, as submitted to the Board of Appeals <br />with current/existing conditions, showing all designated parking spaces and <br />identifying which parking space(2), if any, is associated with any particular unit <br />of the Motel. <br />The "Existing Conditions Plan" is dated October 26, 1982. The Board specified that <br />the Petitioner must submit plans showing the conditions that existed at the time of <br />the settlement. <br />After looking over the submitted plans, the Board voted unanimously to refer this <br />matter back to Town Counsel. The Board is not satisfied with the plans. The Board <br />would like Mr. White to submit certified, registered, stamped engineered plans that <br />show the conditions that exist today. The Board will leave the matter up to Town <br />Counsel to resolve. <br />Accent July 13, 2011 Minutes <br />• Mr. Furbush made a motion to accept the Minutes. Mr. Blaisdell seconded the <br />motion. Mr. Nelson voted yes. Ms. Horton voted yes. Mr. Bonvie voted yes. Mr. <br />1, <br />