Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OFAPPEALS <br />MINUTES <br />AUGUST 10, 2011 <br />• said the whole crux of the matter is whether the land underneath the water is subject to <br />the existing zoning By-law and therefore, under the jurisdiction of the Building <br />Commissioner. <br />Attorney Costello said that Section 174-62 of the Zoning By-laws applies to land. The <br />proposed aquaculture will be located underneath the water. He said that if the velocity <br />requirements are applied to the cages ("structures"), then they would have to be raised to <br />certain elevations, as are piers, ramps and floats. This would be utterly contrary to the <br />nature of this farming endeavor. <br />The Board questioned where the cages will be relocated in the winter. Attorney Wall <br />said that the Petitioner intends to move the cages to deeper water during the winter to <br />protect them from predation. He said that it appears that the proposal will take up most <br />of the grant area, so he isn't sure where the cages will be moved. <br />Attorney Costello said that the Board of Selectmen conditioned the license by requiring <br />the proposed cages to remain below water at all times. Attorney Costello said that the <br />Petitioner would have to stack the cages to ensure that they remain below water. <br />Enforcement rests with the permit granting authority — the Board of Selectmen. <br />The Chair asked for comments from the audience and recognized Mrs. Kristen Hanlon of <br />51 Popponesset Island Road. She said that she won't hear either the machinery or see the <br />• cages, but that she is worried about the safety of families using the area for recreation. <br />Mrs. Hanlon said that surf boarders, boaters, kayakers and jet skiers will venture into the <br />area and run into the cages. <br />Mr. William Sandler of 44 Popponesset Island Road said that the proposal will be 30 feet <br />from his property. He said that children will not be able to swim in the area anymore <br />because of the proposal. <br />Mr. Mark Burtis of 53 Nehoiden Road said he is in favor of the proposal, which is similar <br />in nature to the oyster grant that he has been operating in a residential area in Hamblin <br />Pond in Mashpee for the last 11 years. He said that he addresses all safety issues and <br />maintains markers and buoys that clearly identify his grant area and the submerged <br />equipment. He said that one man cannot realistically maintain 3,000 cages by himself, so <br />the proposal will most likely be far less than that. Mr. Burtis said that the cages must be <br />kept under the water, in the flow in the tidal zone. He said that the Commonwealth <br />embraces aquaculture, which is obviously agriculture. He said that he has building docks <br />for the last 30 years and the boundary is very clear between the land of the <br />Commonwealth and the land of the Town. He said that he went through the same <br />procedure as Mr. Cook has and that abutters have every opportunity to participate in the <br />process because the licenses are granted after public advertising, public hearing, public <br />testimony and comments in a public forum. <br />• Mrs. Leslie Caffyn of 10 Popponesset Island Road showed the Board pictures that she <br />had taken of people kayaking, jet skiing and boating in the area at issue. She said that the <br />area is very busy and expressed concern about safety. Digressing from the focus of the <br />Appeal, Mrs. Caffyn asked the Board to educate her about "a project the Wampanoag <br />6 <br />