09/14/2011ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals September 14, 2011 Minutes • The Board of Health has asked for the following conditions to be incorporated into the Decision: 1. A contract for servicing of the Bio -Retention swales and catch basins shall be submitted annually to the Board of Health. 2. Hazardous materials shall be limited in volume to 200 pounds dry weight and 220 gallons of liquid storage. Hazardous waste shall be limited according to 310 CMR 30.00, Massachusetts Hazardous Waste Regulations. Storage of hazardous materials outside is prohibited. 3. All changes in ownership/tenancy shall be approved by the Board of Health. 4. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) shall be kept on-site in bound notebooks for all hazardous products. The MSDS shall be made available for inspection by an Agent of the Board of Health. Responding to Mr. Bonvie's question about disposal of toxic wastes, Mr. Franey said that materials that are toxic to the aquatic environment are not disposed of down the drain. He said that this type of business is regulated by the federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act and the state Department of Public Health. Mr. Bonvie strongly urged the Board to include the Stormwater Management Agreement in the Decision. He commended the Petitioner for submitting the agreement with a maintenance plan. • The Design Review and Plan Review Committees have approved the project. The Fire Department has confirmed that it has adequate access to the property. Mr. Nelson referred to a letter submitted by the abutters at Sugar Pine Circle. He said that the warehouse is located over 300 feet from the property line of the abutters, not 150 feet as stated in the letter. Mr. Scott Gabriel, an abutter at 24 Sugar Pine Circle, asked about the screening trees in the rear of the property. Mr. Junqueira said that light motion detectors could be installed instead of having the lights on 24 hours a day. Mr. Richard Boyden, an abutter at 16 Sugar Pine Circle, expressed concern with the height of the building and said that Leyland Cypress trees maintain greenery all year long. He insisted that the Petitioner plant them at 10 -foot intervals for a distance of 100 feet on the rear of the property. Mr. Eddy said that the Town's Design Review/Plan Review landscape architect recommended planting of White Pine, a large, fast-growing native tree much like the Leyland Cypress. Mr. Nelson said that the building will have a peaked roof and will appear to be just a large house from a distance. He asked if the Petitioner would agree to installation of a window in the back of the building to make it more aesthetically pleasing. Mr. Junqueira suggested the addition of a round attic vent to the back of the building. • Mr. Seth Zarum of 24 Sugar Pine Circle said that he prefers Leyland Cypress rather than White Pine. He said that he wants to enjoy peace and quiet in his back yard. F1