Laserfiche WebLink
Ili <br /> Mr. of al a explained the Plan to divide the larger <br /> ger <br /> +� <br /> proposes <br /> lots into three (3) by way of a previous ANR Plan. The road is <br /> straight forward. The Last two lots take advantage of the zoning <br /> bylaw that allows reduced fr g oning <br /> b <br /> y frontage. The Building Inspector has <br /> reviewed the Plan and given his approval of the .la out <br /> Y <br /> I,f� Al <br /> { <br /> Mr. ojala requested input/questions from the Board. He <br /> 1 �' <br /> indicated Lots 1, 4. and 3 on the Plan explaining <br /> n hundred-fifty f i ffrontage; ■ p ng they have the <br /> one ty t 15 o} foot Lot 2, being subdivided '.' <br /> r <br /> into three lots; the area requiring review and approval which are '° <br /> numbered Lots 5 5 and 7 pp <br /> The Chairman inquired as to the radius of the cul-de-sac, VA. <br /> Mr. Oj ala replied it was one hundred-twenty (12 0) feet across i;t� <br /> with a sixty (6 o) f oot radius. <br /> The Chairman asked about proposed drainage, to which Mr. °.' <br /> r <br /> Oj ala stated it to be shown on the Plan (basins and leach pits) . <br /> He did say this was tentative, and that it may change slightly. �. <br /> Chance Re i the 1 asked if Lot 7 has required frontage, to <br /> which Mr. Cjala replied,, "Yes" . one hundred-fifty (15o) feet <br /> ��► <br /> measured in a straight line. <br /> h* <br /> The Town Planner asked if the 41.57 is shown from forty o ty 40} <br /> feet. Mr. of ala answered, it is shown from forty (4 0) feet. The <br /> oir�l rk <br /> F Town Planner further inquired about the lower lot line of Lot 61 <br /> being forty (40) feet back along the side lot line. Mr. o]al a <br /> III <br /> I <br /> replied it was measured from the building set-back line. �, r <br /> Responding to a question asked by the Chairman Mr. o 'ala .'`_ <br /> stated the town road drains on the corner of Lot 3 . He stated `� ';` <br /> •4f <br /> this condition has existed for a long time, and that it is <br /> unlikely the Applicant would ever build in that area. <br /> The Town Planner suggested an Easement would be in order, if <br /> there is not already one in existence. He also recalled at the <br /> time of the Preliminary Plan, the Town Engineer had aquestion I ' <br /> about the location of the southern property line. He asked where <br /> the actual property line is located. <br /> Mr. of al a referenced Plan 519, Page 33, indicates another <br /> surveyor' s impression, as shown on the Town Assessor' s Map, to t# <br /> lay Wells Road out in a more formal manner. It was decided to <br /> maintain, the original line, rather than taking the more <br /> ii <br /> aggressive approach of claiming to the center line of the road. t,l <br /> The Town Planner stated this appeared to be a legal, rather _ <br /> than a planning problem. <br /> Mr. Oj al a said this had been generated from a Land Court <br /> F Plan, Whitney & Bassett, 1975 had defined the land use. The Town <br /> Planner f.r: •r , <br /> rights <br /> -2- <br /> suggested at some point Applicant consider deeding rig <br /> �i <br /> F <br /> F <br />