Laserfiche WebLink
�1/p'ry 7 x'n of Mashpee <br /> _. <br /> . / 16 Great ffeck&ad,N rth <br /> 4r57�;, Alaslipee, Massachusetts 02649 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A VARIANCE <br /> V-10-25 <br /> Doris K. Perillo, Trustee Assessor's Map 117 Parcel 257 <br /> Sacchetti Realty Trust Certificate of Title: 178862 <br /> 4 Pond Street <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> A Petition was filed on May 20, 2010 by Doris K. Perillo of Dedham, Massachusetts for <br /> a Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws to vary the lot coverage requirements <br /> and the front setback requirements from Pond Street to allow for construction of a deck to an <br /> existing home on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 4 Pond Street (Map 117 Parcel <br /> 257) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws <br /> Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a newspaper of <br /> general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, June 4, and June 11, 2010, a copy of which is <br /> attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on June 23, 2010. <br /> The following members of the Board were present and acting throughout: Board Members <br /> Robert G. Nelson, Jonathan Furbush and William Blaisdell, and Associate Members Peter <br /> Hinden and Ronald S. Bonvie. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the provisions <br /> of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §10 and the Town of Mashpee Zoning By-laws. <br /> Mr. and Mrs. Perillo represented the Petition. Mr. Perillo stated that the size of the deck <br /> is required to provide accommodation for two handicapped people living in the home. He said <br /> that construction of the deck was undertaken and it became apparent that there was not enough <br /> room for handicap access. The Petitioner halted construction in order to Petition for a Variance <br /> from the Zoning Board of Appeals because increasing the size of the deck will increase the <br /> percentage of lot coverage and will also encroach into the front setback requirements. Mrs. <br /> Perillo explained that her two sisters live in the home,both of whom use wheelchairs. There is <br /> an oversized door accessing the deck. <br /> No comments were received from abutters. <br />