Laserfiche WebLink
!911"cv. Town of Nashpee <br /> 16 Grew Jdeck Agad Xord i <br /> Il,E Nlaslzpee, lklassachz:zsetts 02649 <br /> MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION FOR A VARIANCE <br /> V-10-35 <br /> Michael Cusack Assessor's Map 60 Parcel 76 <br /> 40 Vista Circle Registry of Deeds: <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 Book 6881 Page 288 <br /> A Petition was filed on August 13, 2010 by Michael Cusack requesting a <br /> Variance from Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws to vary the side setback <br /> requirements to allow for an existing garage and replacement of an existing deck with <br /> construction of a sunroom on property located in an R-5 zoning district at 40 Vista <br /> Circle (Map 60 Parcel 76) Mashpee, MA. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General <br /> Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The Mashpee Enterprise, a <br /> newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee, on September 3, and <br /> September 10, 2010, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A Public Hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on <br /> September 22, 2010. The following members of the Board were present and acting <br /> throughout: Board Members Robert G. Nelson, William A. Blaisdell, James Reiffarth <br /> and John M. Dorsey, and Associate Board Member Peter R. Hinden. <br /> The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals issues this Decision pursuant to the <br /> provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A §10 and the Town of Mashpee <br /> Zoning By-laws. <br /> Mr. Kevin Kieler of Brady-Built Sunrooms represented the Petition. The <br /> homeowner Mr. Michael Cusack also attended the meeting. Mr. Kieler said that the <br /> long, narrow lot restricts location of the proposed sunroom. He said that the proposed <br /> construction is a high quality, custom-made solid wood structure. The existing deck <br /> was mistakenly constructed within the 15-foot side setback. With removal of the <br /> existing deck, the proposal will result in less of an encroachment into the setback. Lot <br /> coverage will be 16.8%. <br /> Building Commissioner Richard Stevens said that the subject property is in a <br /> cluster subdivision with setback requirements of 30 feet from the front, 15 feet from the <br /> side and 20 feet from the back. <br /> No comments were received from abutters. <br />