Laserfiche WebLink
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> 12 Brookside Circle <br /> Mashpee, MA 02649 <br /> k Appellant: James Regan <br /> Owner of Record: Barry J. and Laura J. Marsolais <br /> A-10-44 <br /> Correspondence dated September 16, 2010 from Building Commissioner Richard <br /> Stevens to Attorney Gildea reads: "The current setbacks for Cluster Subdivisions in the <br /> Town of Mashpee are 30 feet from the front, 15 feet on the sides and 20 feet at the rear. <br /> These are the only setbacks I would be able to enforce under the Town of Mashpee <br /> Zoning Bylaws." Mr. Stevens said that there is no definition in the Zoning By-laws <br /> referring to a building line. He said that the subject property is a buildable lot. <br /> Mr. Furbush said that the current owner has been paying taxes on a buildable lot <br /> for years and he should be allowed to build on the lot. Attorney Gildea countered that he <br /> was not saying that the lot could not be developed, but that the owner should be required <br /> to adhere to the subdivision plan as approved by the Planning Board and as recorded at <br /> the Registry. <br /> Attorney Gildea quoted Section 174-21.1) of the Zoning By-laws, which states: <br /> "Building lots in cluster subdivisions created under previous provisions of the Mashpee <br /> Zoning By-Law not requiring a special permit may be developed pursuant to the lot size, <br /> frontage and setback regulations applicable to the original approval of said subdivision, <br /> but subject to any other currently applicable provisions of this by-law." He suggested <br /> that the owner could apply to the ZBA for Variance relief to allow for development of the <br /> parcel. Mr. Bonvie said that there is a substantial difference between "maybe" and "will <br /> be" and suggested that the word "maybe" indicates that interpreting the applicable <br /> setback requirements should be left to the good judgment and authority of the Building <br /> Commissioner. <br /> Mr. Reiffarth pointed out that the three abutting lots are twice the size of the <br /> subject property and could easily comply with the 60-foot setback. He said that the <br /> owner of the subject property has a significant hardship to conform to a 60-foot setback. <br /> Attorney Kevin M. Kirrane represented Mr. and Mrs. Marsolais, owners of the <br /> subject property. He said that he agrees with the Building Commissioner and that the <br /> setback requirements as set forth in the By-laws should be enforced. Attorney Kirrane <br /> said that the Conservation Commission has approved plans for a three-bedroom dwelling <br /> which does comply with the 30-foot front setback requirements on the subject property. <br /> The owner of the property has not yet applied for a building permit. <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS: <br /> The subject property is located at 12 Brookside Circle and consists of 16,600 <br /> square feet of land. <br /> CHAPTER 40A <br /> Appeals to permit granting authority <br /> Section 8 <br /> An appeal to the permit granting authority as the zoning ordinance or by-law may <br /> provide, may be taken by any person aggrieved by reason of his inability to obtain <br /> 2 <br />