My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/08/2009 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
07/08/2009 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2022 5:07:11 PM
Creation date
1/28/2022 4:06:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/08/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals Ralph Marcelli <br /> 2 V-09-25 <br /> it. James Reiffarth makes a motion to grant a 3.79 foot variance on the westerly side <br /> (frontage) and a 21,194 square foot landspace variance, as well as granting relief from the <br /> fire restriction by-law with the letter from the Fire Chief to be provided. Jonathan <br /> Furbush seconds the motion. All agree. So moved. Reference plans from Kingsbury <br /> Surveying Co., Inc. of Sandwich, MA, dated June 6, 1978. <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS <br /> 1. that the subject lot is located at 29 Melissa Avenue and contains 58,806 square <br /> feet. <br /> VARIANCE CRITERIA <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine <br /> that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and <br /> not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would <br /> involve hardship to the petitioner. <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> The Board determined that: <br /> 1. that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography that affect <br /> the subject lot and not the district in which it is located. <br /> 2. that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would involve hardship to the <br /> Petitioner. <br /> 3. that relief may be granted without detriment to the public good. <br /> 4. that relief may be granted without derogating from the intent or purpose of the <br /> By-laws. <br /> 5. that the Board determined that without relief the lot could not be used for a <br /> residence, the purpose for which it had been laid out and for which the <br /> balance of the undersized lots in the subdivision were being used. <br /> 6. that the lot has been maintained as a separate buildable lot on the Assessor's <br /> Records and is subject to betterments from the Water District. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.