Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Zoning 2 <br /> Board of Appeals Cornelius Ferris <br /> V-08-43 <br /> requiring. Once the house is demolished,then the lot becomes too small and requires a <br /> variance for landspace as well as frontage, which the applicant has applied for. The <br /> proposed lot coverage is 13.7% which is well under the 20% maximum. James Reiffarth <br /> asks about rain gardens being installed. Mr. Cauley informs him that Conservation has <br /> asked for dry wells to be installed. He is open to the possibility of installing rain gardens <br /> if the Board deems them necessary. Mr. Nelson would like to see the lot re-graded which <br /> would include gravel being brought in to fix the pot holes in front of the lot. <br /> Additionally, there will be no basement allowed in this dwelling. After some further <br /> discussion regarding the plot plan, Mr.Nelson asks the Board if they are ready for a <br /> motion. James Reiffarth makes a motion to grant a 17,821 square foot variance and a 75 <br /> foot frontage variance with the conditions that the Board of Health requirements be met <br /> as well as that of the Conservation Commission. Additionally,there is to be re-grading <br /> on Seconsett Point Road up to the lot where there are pot holes and the grading needs to <br /> be fixed. Jonathan Furbush seconds the motion. <br /> VARIANCE CRITERIA <br /> Section 10 of Chapter 40A requires that the permit granting authority determine <br /> that there are circumstances relating to the shape and topography which affect this lot and <br /> not the district in which it is located and that a literal enforcement of the By-laws would <br /> involve hardship to the petitioner. <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS <br /> 1. that the subject property is located at 38 Seconsett Point Road and contains <br /> 22,179 square feet. <br /> SPECIFIC FINDINGS <br /> The Board determined that: <br /> 1. a literal enforcement of the By'-laws would involve hardship to the Petitioner. <br /> 2. the proposal would bean improvement to the subject lot and to the <br /> neighborhood; therefore, relief may be granted without detriment to the public <br /> good and without derogating from the intent or purpose of the By-laws. <br />