My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/10/2008 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
>
09/10/2008 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2022 5:03:12 PM
Creation date
2/1/2022 3:11:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Zoning <br /> Board of Appeals Daniel Ayer <br /> 2 V-08-40 <br /> f plans to the Board and shows where the relief will be needed. Attorney <br /> Kenney explains to the Board that there would be no building envelope left <br /> if all the zoning were conformed to. The Board reviews the plans and try to <br /> suggest some alternatives to reduce the variance request. Jonathan Furbush <br /> suggests moving the deck around—Mr. Cook says that they would lose the <br /> use of the deck should these suggested changes be made. There is limited <br /> movement for any acceptable changes. Mr. Cook says that the bulkhead is in <br /> the way and there is only one window for an egress. They discuss the one <br /> foot offset and the Board is reluctant to give a variance of 39 feet— it would <br /> send a message that they are not comfortable with. Attorney Kenney says <br /> that the lot line abuts a road that will never be developed and there are no <br /> abutters that are concerned. They all discuss various suggestions to reduce <br /> the variance request. Jonathan Furbush also suggest making the room round <br /> and changing the pitch of the roof. Mr. Cook says that he can make some <br /> compromises after he speaks with his client. The Board discusses the shed <br /> and how far off the lot line it needs to be—they ask Mr. Stevens if it needs <br /> to conform to frontyard setbacks or can it just sit 5 feet off the lot line. It is <br /> determined that the applicant will need a variance for the shed if it stays in <br /> that area. The Board would like to see revised plans before they grant <br /> anything. The matter will be continued until October 8, 2008 at which time <br /> the new plans will be submitted and the Board is in agreement to grant the <br /> variances with the compromises they have come up with. <br /> October 8, 2008 <br /> Steven Cook represents the applicant at this continued hearing from <br /> September 24, 2008. The Board had asked Mr. Cook to submit the new set <br /> of plans they compromised with so the Board could approve the addition <br /> with the plans dated October 1, 2008. Jack Dorsey makes a motion to grant <br /> the following: <br /> A 38 foot variance for the addition to Cataquin Road <br /> A 24 foot variance for the shed from Cataquin Road <br /> A 22 foot variance for the shed from Annawon Road <br /> Robert Nelson seconds the motion. All agree. So moved. <br /> s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.