01/10/2007 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes 1 January 10, 2007 . TOWN OF MASHPEE Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes — Wednesday, January 10, 2007 The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals held a Public Hearing on Wednesday, January 10, 2007. at the Mashpee Town Hall. Board Members Robert Nelson, Zella Elizenberry, Frederick Borgeson, Marshall Brem and Jonathan Furbush were present along with alternate members James Reiffarth, and Eric Dublirer. Alternate members George Boton and Martin Gordon were absent. , 1 Mr. Nelson brought the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Zella Elizenberry read the continuances for tonight's hearing. Continued Hearings David Hufnazel: Requests a Special Permit from Sections 174-17 and 174-20 in order to demolish existing dwelling and rebuild a new dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning' district at 58 Monomoscoy Road West (Map 114 Parcel 95) Mashpee, MA. • Owner of Record: .lames Kahveit David Hufnaeel: Requests a Variance from Section 174-31 to seek relief from the setback requirements and landspace requirements in order to rebuild a new dwelling on property located in an R-3 zoning district at 58 Monomoscoy Road West (Map 114 Parcel 95) Mashpee, MA. Owner of Record: James Kahveit Sitting: Robert Nelson, Zella Elizenberry, Marshall Brem, Frederick Borgeson, and Jonathan Furbush; Alexander Watt, Esq.,along with Jack Landers-Cauley represent Mr. Hufnagel. This matter was originally heard on September 13, 2006 continued to October 25, 2006, then to December 13, 2006 and then January 10, 2007 whereby the applicant seeks to raze and replace existing dwelling with a new three bedroom dwelling. There were many continuances due to concerns from the DPW, Fire Department and plans needing to be re -drawn depicting said requests. The Board had asked for applicant to satisfy all requests from the Fire Department and the DPW with respect to signs on the roads and widening the street for access by emergency vehicles. Mr. Nelson reads into the record the emails from the DPW and Fire Department stating that once all requirements are complete, they will be satisfied. The Board discusses notifying the abutters specifically on widening the road just for a courtesy purpose since it will affect them directly. Attorney Watt mentions they do not want any legal ramifications from this notification. • It is decided a letter will be written by the applicant to just inform the abutters about the street improvement. The Board also conditions this matter on an admistrative