Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Mashpee <br />Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes <br />2 October 24, 2007 <br />• intends to. Jonathan Furbush asks if dry wells will be used? John Slavinsky says they <br />will use French drains on drip edges — 60% of landscaping turns into spongy material and <br />is retained on property. There will be no spill over onto Cross Street. The difference is <br />225 square feet from existing to proposed. The newer houses are facing the water. <br />Bob Nelson mentions that although he normally is adamant about adhering to the 20% lot <br />coverage, this neighborhood all has lots about 5,000 square feet and have all received lot <br />coverage in the range of 22%, which is where he would like to stay. He feels the new <br />dwelling will be beneficial to the town and the tax revenue since the lot is assessed at <br />$2.4 million. <br />George Bolton asks about the stone patio and what materials will be used. Mr. Slavinsky <br />tells him blue stone with open jointed apron. The cobble stone driveway is for no runoff <br />and is pitched toward Cross Street. <br />Mr. Nelson reads all of the abutter's emails into the record. Mr. Slavinsky informs the <br />Board that Con Com was very sensitive to this plan and the Board of Health has <br />addressed some of the issues as well. <br />One of the abutters mentions that there is a lighting problem that cascades over onto the <br />beach that is bothersome to some of the area residents when they walk the beach and their <br />steps are on the abutting property. Mr. Nelson informs them that this is not the concern <br />• of the ZBA. <br />Bart Dutto: <br />Rock Island Road <br />He mentions the lighting issue as well and wants the steps removed. He would <br />like to see the vegetation removed that inhibits walking and access to the beach. <br />Jim Collins <br />4&6 Rock Island Road <br />'He explains he is an abutter due to the common area owned by all 38 area <br />residents for the Park Reservation — each resident owns a piece of that property. No one <br />has lived in the property at issue for over 25 years. There have been issues that the ]ionic <br />has not been taken care of , there are too many cars there in the summer and too many <br />people. The proposed house is too big and not necessary. Mr. Collins explains he was <br />able to build a reasonable house that is 1,800 square feet on a 5,500 square foot lot. <br />John Slavinsky mentions you cannot use the buffer lot to gain square footage for your <br />property — town counsel ruled on that on a previous matter. <br />Mr. Collins mentions that the lot is steep and appears high with the proposed house on it. <br />0 <br />Mr. Nelson informs him that the height is conforming. <br />